MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1186/s12894-019-0456-6

Медицинская библиотека · BMC urology · 2019

Penoscrotal edema: a case report and literature review.

Lin Tian, Lin Yun-Zhi, Wu Yu-Peng, Lin Ting-Ting, Chen Dong-Ning, Wei Yong, Xue Xue-Yi, Xu Ning

Клинический случайСтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Penoscrotal edema is typically caused by lymphatic obstruction, which can have both primary and secondary causes. Studies describing congenital penoscrotal edema are rare. Surgery can be divided into two types: The first approach involves extensive removal of diseased tissue and tissue reconstruction. The second approach is removal of the lesions and creating additional lymphatic vascular anastomoses.

CASE PRESENTATION: We present a case report of a 15-year-old patient with recurrent penoscrotal edema and swelling of both lower extremities. The literature were also reviewed to provide additional information. Physical examination revealed slow lymphatic reflux of the lower extremities and no obvious abnormalities in testicular morphology, bilaterally, or blood supply. Surgery was performed by excising the affected skin and subcutaneous tissue and the flaps was cut in the middle in Y shape to cover the penis and scrotum. Postoperative follow-up revealed wound integrity and patient satisfaction with the outcome.

CONCLUSION

Excision and reconstructive surgery are the primary treatments for penoscrotal edema. The majority of reported patients undergoing excision and reconstruction achieved satisfactory reshaping and improved their life quality.

Для цитирования: Lin Tian, Lin Yun-Zhi, Wu Yu-Peng, Lin Ting-Ting, Chen Dong-Ning, Wei Yong, Xue Xue-Yi, Xu Ning. Penoscrotal edema: a case report and literature review.. BMC urology. 2019. DOI: 10.1186/s12894-019-0456-6.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.