The Journal of heart valve disease · 1998
Twelve-year experience with Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT pericardial valve in the mitral position: a multicenter study.
Клиническое исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Marchand M, Aupart M, Norton R, Goldsmith I R, Pelletier C, Pellerin M, Dubiel T, Daenen W, Casselman F, Holden M, David T E, Ryba E A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND AIMS OF THE STUDY: The study aim was to assess the durability of the Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT pericardial bioprosthesis in the mitral position.
METHODS: This seven-center retrospective clinical study involved the follow up of 333 patients who underwent isolated mitral valve replacement and 102 patients who underwent double (mitral and aortic) valve replacement with the PERIMOUNT pericardial valve between 1984 and 1989. Mean patient age at implant was 60.7 +/- 11.6 years; 41.1% were males. The most common etiology was rheumatic heart disease (53.9%) and the most common mechanism mitral insufficiency. All patients but six were followed for an average of 7.2 +/- 3.6 years after surgery; total follow up was 3071.7 patient-years (pt-yr).
RESULTS: The total operative mortality rate was 7.6%; this included a valve-related mortality rate of 0.2%. The late mortality rate was 5.2% per pt-yr, of which 1.4% per pt-yr was considered valve-related. At 11 years, the overall actuarial survival rate was 53.3 +/- 2.8%, and actuarial freedom from valve-related death 83.9 +/- 2.6%. At follow up, 80% of patients were in NYHA class I or II, and 74% showed improvement. Twenty-eight incidences of deterioration requiring explant were observed. At 11 years the actuarial freedom from explant due to structural failure was 84.9 +/- 3.1%. Rates of structural failure decreased with age: the actuarial freedom from explant due to structural failure was 78.1 +/- 4.8% for patients aged < or = 60 years, 89.4 +/- 4.4% for those aged 61-70 years, and 100% for those aged over 71 years.
CONCLUSION: The Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT pericardial bioprosthesis is a reliable choice when a tissue valve is required, especially in patients over 60 years of age.
METHODS: This seven-center retrospective clinical study involved the follow up of 333 patients who underwent isolated mitral valve replacement and 102 patients who underwent double (mitral and aortic) valve replacement with the PERIMOUNT pericardial valve between 1984 and 1989. Mean patient age at implant was 60.7 +/- 11.6 years; 41.1% were males. The most common etiology was rheumatic heart disease (53.9%) and the most common mechanism mitral insufficiency. All patients but six were followed for an average of 7.2 +/- 3.6 years after surgery; total follow up was 3071.7 patient-years (pt-yr).
RESULTS: The total operative mortality rate was 7.6%; this included a valve-related mortality rate of 0.2%. The late mortality rate was 5.2% per pt-yr, of which 1.4% per pt-yr was considered valve-related. At 11 years, the overall actuarial survival rate was 53.3 +/- 2.8%, and actuarial freedom from valve-related death 83.9 +/- 2.6%. At follow up, 80% of patients were in NYHA class I or II, and 74% showed improvement. Twenty-eight incidences of deterioration requiring explant were observed. At 11 years the actuarial freedom from explant due to structural failure was 84.9 +/- 3.1%. Rates of structural failure decreased with age: the actuarial freedom from explant due to structural failure was 78.1 +/- 4.8% for patients aged < or = 60 years, 89.4 +/- 4.4% for those aged 61-70 years, and 100% for those aged over 71 years.
CONCLUSION: The Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT pericardial bioprosthesis is a reliable choice when a tissue valve is required, especially in patients over 60 years of age.