Journal of laparoendoscopic & advanced surgical techniques. Part A · 2011
Laparoscopic transperitoneal pyelolithotomy for management of staghorn renal calculi.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Nouralizadeh Akbar, Simforoosh Nasser, Soltani Mohammad Hossein, Sarhangnejad Reza, Ardestanizadeh Arash, Shabaninia Shahram, Ziaee Seyed Amir Mohsen
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Recent developments in laparoscopic and retroperitoneoscopic techniques have modified the treatment of renal and ureteral stones. We present the efficacy and possible adverse complications of laparoscopic pyelolithotomy for the treatment of staghorn stones as an alternative to percutaneous nephrolithotomy (PCNL) in our single-surgeon series.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients (10 males and 3 females) underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy for removal of staghorn stones. Mean stone size was 5.1 cm (range, 4-6.5 cm). All patients had large stones in the renal pelvis and several (more than two) calices with extrarenal pelvis.
RESULTS: Mean operative time was 177 minutes (range, 110-240 minutes), and the mean hospital stay was 4 days (range, 3-7 days). Transfusion was not required in any patient, and open conversion did not happen. Overall success rate was 84.6% (11/13), and 2 patients had residual stones that were managed with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. There were no major complications (bleeding, sepsis, bowel injury, or urinary leakage).
CONCLUSION: The role of laparoscopic kidney stone surgery has not been defined well, but laparoscopic transperitoneal pyelolithotomy may be performed with proper results and negligible complications in skillful hands. It could be a suitable alternative to PCNL for the treatment of staghorn stones in selected cases.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: Thirteen patients (10 males and 3 females) underwent transperitoneal laparoscopic pyelolithotomy for removal of staghorn stones. Mean stone size was 5.1 cm (range, 4-6.5 cm). All patients had large stones in the renal pelvis and several (more than two) calices with extrarenal pelvis.
RESULTS: Mean operative time was 177 minutes (range, 110-240 minutes), and the mean hospital stay was 4 days (range, 3-7 days). Transfusion was not required in any patient, and open conversion did not happen. Overall success rate was 84.6% (11/13), and 2 patients had residual stones that were managed with extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy. There were no major complications (bleeding, sepsis, bowel injury, or urinary leakage).
CONCLUSION: The role of laparoscopic kidney stone surgery has not been defined well, but laparoscopic transperitoneal pyelolithotomy may be performed with proper results and negligible complications in skillful hands. It could be a suitable alternative to PCNL for the treatment of staghorn stones in selected cases.