Implant dentistry · 2019
Alveolar Ridge Preservation Using Autologous Demineralized Tooth Matrix and Platelet-Rich Fibrin Versus Platelet-Rich Fibrin Alone: A Split-Mouth Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ouyyamwongs Warisara, Leepong Narit, Suttapreyasri Srisurang
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To assess the potential of using autologous demineralized tooth matrix (aDTM) in combination with platelet-rich fibrin (PRF) membrane (aDTM/PRF) or PRF membrane alone (control) to preserve the ridge dimension and facilitate bone healing after tooth extraction.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty premolar sockets were assigned to either the aDTM/PRF or control group. Horizontal and vertical ridge changes were evaluated at the baseline 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks using cast-based and periapical radiographs.
RESULTS: aDTM was well tolerated in all sites without incidences of postoperative complication. The change in horizontal ridge width was significantly greater in the control compared with the aDTM/PRF group. The overall vertical marginal bone resorption on the mesial, distal, and central site in the aDTM/PRF group was not statistically different from the control group. During the first 6 weeks, the bone healing density in the aDTM/PRF group was significantly higher than that of the control group, then it converged at week 8.
CONCLUSION: Application of aDTM with PRF membrane is useful for ridge preservation by reducing the horizontal ridge collapse and promoting bone healing as shown clinically and radiographically.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Forty premolar sockets were assigned to either the aDTM/PRF or control group. Horizontal and vertical ridge changes were evaluated at the baseline 2, 4, 6, and 8 weeks using cast-based and periapical radiographs.
RESULTS: aDTM was well tolerated in all sites without incidences of postoperative complication. The change in horizontal ridge width was significantly greater in the control compared with the aDTM/PRF group. The overall vertical marginal bone resorption on the mesial, distal, and central site in the aDTM/PRF group was not statistically different from the control group. During the first 6 weeks, the bone healing density in the aDTM/PRF group was significantly higher than that of the control group, then it converged at week 8.
CONCLUSION: Application of aDTM with PRF membrane is useful for ridge preservation by reducing the horizontal ridge collapse and promoting bone healing as shown clinically and radiographically.