Journal of endodontics · 2019
Orthodontic-induced External Root Resorption of Endodontically Treated Teeth: A Meta-analysis.
СтатьяМетаанализСистематический обзорНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Alhadainy Hatem A, Flores-Mir Carlos, Abdel-Karim Amany H, Crossman Jacqueline, El-Bialy Tarek
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: The difference in the amount of orthodontic-induced external root resorption (OIERR) of endodontically treated teeth (ETT) compared with vital pulp teeth (VPT) treatment is controversial. This systematic review and meta-analysis assessed the available evidence regarding OIERR of ETT compared with VPT.
METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched up to May 2018 to retrieve relevant studies. The studies were evaluated for eligibility criteria, and the risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions tool (Cochrane Bias Methods Group, Odense, Denmark). Weighted means of OIERR in ETT and VPT were calculated using a fixed effects model, and a random effects model was used to assess the significance of treatment effects.
RESULTS: Eight studies were identified, from which 7 were included in the meta-analyses. The funnel plot of the random effects model exhibited a symmetrical distribution, which indicates no publication bias of the included studies. Because of the significant heterogeneity between studies, a random effects model was used. Significantly less OIERR for ETT was identified compared with their contralateral VPT.
CONCLUSIONS: Endodontic treatment does not seem to increase OIERR.
METHODS: PubMed, Scopus, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Cochrane databases were searched up to May 2018 to retrieve relevant studies. The studies were evaluated for eligibility criteria, and the risk of bias was assessed using the Risk of Bias In Non-randomised Studies of Interventions tool (Cochrane Bias Methods Group, Odense, Denmark). Weighted means of OIERR in ETT and VPT were calculated using a fixed effects model, and a random effects model was used to assess the significance of treatment effects.
RESULTS: Eight studies were identified, from which 7 were included in the meta-analyses. The funnel plot of the random effects model exhibited a symmetrical distribution, which indicates no publication bias of the included studies. Because of the significant heterogeneity between studies, a random effects model was used. Significantly less OIERR for ETT was identified compared with their contralateral VPT.
CONCLUSIONS: Endodontic treatment does not seem to increase OIERR.