DOI 10.1016/j.gene.2018.06.011
Data integration for functional annotation of regulatory single nucleotide polymorphisms associated with Alzheimer's disease susceptibility.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Alzheimer's disease (AD), the most common form of dementia affects 24.3 million people worldwide. More than twenty genetic loci have been associated with AD and a significant number of genetic variants were mapped within these loci. A large proportion of genome wide significant variants lie outside the coding region. However, the plausible function of these variants is still unexplored.
OBJECTIVE
The present study aimed to unravel the regulatory role of proxy single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs), to determine their risk of developing AD.
METHODS
The RegulomeDB was employed to predict the regulatory role of proxy SNPs. Protein association network and functional enrichment analysis was performed using String10.5 and gene ontology, respectively.
RESULTS
A total of 451 SNPs were examined through SNAP web portal (r2 ≤ 0.80) which returned 2186 proxy SNPs in linkage disequilibrium (LD) with genome wide significant SNPs for AD. Out of 2186 SNPs analyzed in RegulomeDB, 151 had the scores < 3 that indicates the high degree of their potential regulatory function. Further analysis revealed that out of these 151 SNPs, 37 were genome wide significant for AD, 17 were significantly associated with diseases other than AD, 89 were proxy SNPs (not genome wide significant) for various diseases including AD while 8 SNPs were novel proxy SNPs for AD.
CONCLUSION
These findings support the notion that the non-coding variants can be strongly associated with disease risk. Further validation through genome wide association studies will be helpful for the elucidation of their regulatory potential.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.