MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_2304_20

Медицинская библиотека · The Indian journal of medical research · 2020

Pooled testing for COVID-19 diagnosis by real-time RT-PCR: A multi-site comparative evaluation of 5- & 10-sample pooling.

Praharaj Ira, Jain Amita, Singh Mini, Balakrishnan Anukumar, Dhodapkar Rahul, Borkakoty Biswajyoti, Ashok Munivenkatappa, Das Pradeep, Biswas Debasis, Kalawat Usha, Turuk Jyotirmayee, Sugunan A P, Prakash Shantanu, Singh Anirudh K, Barathidasan Rajamani, Subhadra Subhra, Sabat Jyotsnamayee, Manjunath M J, Kanta Poonam, Mudhigeti Nagaraja, Hazarika Rahul, Mishra Hricha, Abhishek Kumar, Santhalembi C, Dikhit Manas Ranjan, Vijay Neetu, Narayan Jitendra, Kaur Harmanmeet, Giri Sidhartha, Gupta Nivedita

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND &

OBJECTIVES

Public health and diagnostic laboratories are facing huge sample loads for COVID-19 diagnosis by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction (RT-PCR). High sensitivity of optimized real-time RT-PCR assays makes pooled testing a potentially efficient strategy for resource utilization when positivity rates for particular regions or groups of individuals are low. We report here a comparative analysis of pooled testing for 5- and 10-sample pools by real-time RT-PCR across 10 COVID-19 testing laboratories in India.

METHODS

Ten virus research and diagnostic laboratories (VRDLs) testing for COVID-19 by real-time RT-PCR participated in this evaluation. At each laboratory, 100 nasopharyngeal swab samples including 10 positive samples were used to create 5- and 10-sample pools with one positive sample in each pool. RNA extraction and real-time RT-PCR for SARS-CoV-2-specific E gene target were performed for individual positive samples as well as pooled samples. Concordance between individual sample testing and testing in the 5- or 10-sample pools was calculated, and the variation across sites and by sample cycle threshold (Ct) values was analyzed.

RESULTS

A total of 110 each of 5- and 10-sample pools were evaluated. Concordance between the 5-sample pool and individual sample testing was 100 per cent in the Ct value ≤30 cycles and 95.5 per cent for Ctvalues ≤33 cycles. Overall concordance between the 5-sample pooled and individual sample testing was 88 per cent while that between 10-sample pool and individual sample testing was 66 per cent. Although the concordance rates for both the 5- and 10-sample pooled testing varied across laboratories, yet for samples with Ct values ≤33 cycles, the concordance was ≥90 per cent across all laboratories for the 5-sample pools.

INTERPRETATION &

CONCLUSIONS

Results from this multi-site assessment suggest that pooling five samples for SARS-CoV-2 detection by real-time RT-PCR may be an acceptable strategy without much loss of sensitivity even for low viral loads, while with 10-sample pools, there may be considerably higher numbers of false negatives. However, testing laboratories should perform validations with the specific RNA extraction and RT-PCR kits in use at their centres before initiating pooled testing.

Для цитирования: Praharaj Ira, Jain Amita, Singh Mini, Balakrishnan Anukumar, Dhodapkar Rahul, Borkakoty Biswajyoti, Ashok Munivenkatappa, Das Pradeep, Biswas Debasis, Kalawat Usha, Turuk Jyotirmayee, Sugunan A P, Prakash Shantanu, Singh Anirudh K, Barathidasan Rajamani, Subhadra Subhra, Sabat Jyotsnamayee, Manjunath M J, Kanta Poonam, Mudhigeti Nagaraja, Hazarika Rahul, Mishra Hricha, Abhishek Kumar, Santhalembi C, Dikhit Manas Ranjan, Vijay Neetu, Narayan Jitendra, Kaur Harmanmeet, Giri Sidhartha, Gupta Nivedita. Pooled testing for COVID-19 diagnosis by real-time RT-PCR: A multi-site comparative evaluation of 5- & 10-sample pooling.. The Indian journal of medical research. 2020. DOI: 10.4103/ijmr.ijmr_2304_20.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.