MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1155/sci5/8197293

Медицинская библиотека · Scientifica · 2025

Bacterial Leakage Testing in Dentistry: A Comprehensive Review on Methods, Models, and Clinical Relevance.

Snigdha Niher Tabassum, Karobari Mohmed Isaqali

СтатьяОбзорПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

The marginal gap increases the rate of bacterial leakage and treatment failure; the measurement of the marginal gap is questionable. The literature revealed that when bacteria get trapped within the smear layer, they can multiply and re-contaminate the root canal system, leading to treatment failure.

METHODOLOGY: A literature search was carried out in multiple databases, including PubMed, Web of Science, Scopus, and ScienceDirect, with the help of MeSH terms such as Bacterial infection, Bacterial leakage, Dental leakage, Dental material, Root canal preparation, Root canal obturation, and Tooth penetration.

RESULT: The initial result of the search showed 2252 articles that were relevant enough. However, only 26 articles were eligible based on inclusion criteria.

CONCLUSION

The bacterial leakage test can evaluate one of the most essential properties of dental material: sealing ability. The sealing ability of a dental material can prevent bacterial ingestion and reduce the treatment failure rate. This study discussed all the steps of the bacterial leakage test in detail. This study can help the researcher plan and run a bacterial leakage study successfully, and the results can help clinicians choose the best sealing material for the clinical scenario.

Для цитирования: Snigdha Niher Tabassum, Karobari Mohmed Isaqali. Bacterial Leakage Testing in Dentistry: A Comprehensive Review on Methods, Models, and Clinical Relevance.. Scientifica. 2025. DOI: 10.1155/sci5/8197293.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.