Perspectives in public health · 2025
Unseen pathogen pathways: the impact of high-touch surfaces in public spaces.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ackerley L M, Cooper S M, Upson S E, Gent L C, Paskey A C, Buckley C, Spitzer M E, Sexton J D, Picton J L, Reynolds K A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Surface contamination via hands plays an important role in pathogen spread in public spaces, particularly where numerous people interact with shared surfaces and objects. This study aimed to identify frequently touched surfaces, examine their interconnections, and evaluate the spread of a surrogate virus in a hotel lobby.
METHODS: In a working hotel lobby (in Arizona, USA) a total of 30 h of observation were performed to identify the surfaces and objects touched by hotel users. The observed area included the lobby entrance, check-in desk and other communal areas. The sequence of touches performed by each observed individual was recorded, from which surface-to-surface interactions and fomite interconnections were determined. An entry doorknob and first floor elevator button were seeded with a bacteriophage (Phi X174) tracer; 4 h later, 25 surfaces were swabbed to determine tracer distribution and contamination levels.
RESULTS: A total of 324 individuals performed 627 touches of 13 different fomites. The elevator button and front desk counter were the most frequently touched (32% and 22%, respectively). More than half (56%) touched 2 or more surfaces. Touches from the elevator button to other surfaces and from other surfaces to the elevator button made up 50% of all interactions.From two seeded sites, the tracer spread to 13 surfaces over 4 h. The most contaminated surfaces were tables, counter tops and door handles.
CONCLUSIONS: The significant role of hands in transferring pathogens across frequently touched and highly interconnected surfaces in a hotel lobby was demonstrated through observations and sampling, highlighting the opportunity for hand and surface hygiene interventions to break the chain of infection in this hotel setting. These findings have implications for the optimisation of hygiene interventions in other hotel settings and are also applicable to similar public spaces, where common shared surfaces and objects (such as front desk counters and elevator buttons) could be targeted.
METHODS: In a working hotel lobby (in Arizona, USA) a total of 30 h of observation were performed to identify the surfaces and objects touched by hotel users. The observed area included the lobby entrance, check-in desk and other communal areas. The sequence of touches performed by each observed individual was recorded, from which surface-to-surface interactions and fomite interconnections were determined. An entry doorknob and first floor elevator button were seeded with a bacteriophage (Phi X174) tracer; 4 h later, 25 surfaces were swabbed to determine tracer distribution and contamination levels.
RESULTS: A total of 324 individuals performed 627 touches of 13 different fomites. The elevator button and front desk counter were the most frequently touched (32% and 22%, respectively). More than half (56%) touched 2 or more surfaces. Touches from the elevator button to other surfaces and from other surfaces to the elevator button made up 50% of all interactions.From two seeded sites, the tracer spread to 13 surfaces over 4 h. The most contaminated surfaces were tables, counter tops and door handles.
CONCLUSIONS: The significant role of hands in transferring pathogens across frequently touched and highly interconnected surfaces in a hotel lobby was demonstrated through observations and sampling, highlighting the opportunity for hand and surface hygiene interventions to break the chain of infection in this hotel setting. These findings have implications for the optimisation of hygiene interventions in other hotel settings and are also applicable to similar public spaces, where common shared surfaces and objects (such as front desk counters and elevator buttons) could be targeted.