MedElevator
Войти в исследования International journal of cardiology · 2017
Long-term outcome of catheter ablation for left posterior fascicular ventricular tachycardia with the development of left posterior fascicular block and characteristics of repeat procedures.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Luo Bin, Zhou Gongbu, Guo Xiaogang, Liu Xu, Yang Jiandu, Sun Qi, Ma Jian, Zhang Shu
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: The present study aimed to retrospectively investigate long-term clinical outcomes of patients undergoing catheter ablation of left posterior fascicular ventricular tachycardia (LPF-VT) with the development of left posterior fascicular block (LPF block) and characteristics of repeat procedures.
METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 195 patients (mean age 29.76±1.03years, 16.4% females) who underwent catheter ablation for LPF-VT were consecutively enrolled. The earliest ventricular potential with a single fused Purkinje potential (PP) during VT and the PP located in the inferior-apical or mid-apical septum during SR were targeted for linear ablation. The endpoint of the procedure was noninducible VT and development of new-onset LPF block. Follow-up with clinic visits or telephonic interviews, electrocardiogram (ECG), or Holter monitoring was performed after the procedure. With a median follow-up of 85 (18,181) months, 20 patients were censored and 152 of 175 (86.86%) patients had long-term freedom from VT after a single procedure. No statistical difference in the outcome of catheter ablation of LPF-VT was found between inducible and non-inducible groups (P=0.89). Twenty-three patients exhibited recurrent LPF-VT. Seven of 23 patients developed new-onset left upper septal ventricular tachycardia that was successfully ablated. All the patients undergoing repeat procedures had freedom from VT. No procedural complications occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: Ablation of LPF-VT using the development of LPF block as the endpoint is associated with a high procedural success rate. No difference in freedom from LPF-VT was found between inducible and non-inducible patients. New-onset LPF block recovery and non-early PP-QRS interval can be the predictors of LPF-VT repeat procedure.
METHODS AND RESULTS: A total of 195 patients (mean age 29.76±1.03years, 16.4% females) who underwent catheter ablation for LPF-VT were consecutively enrolled. The earliest ventricular potential with a single fused Purkinje potential (PP) during VT and the PP located in the inferior-apical or mid-apical septum during SR were targeted for linear ablation. The endpoint of the procedure was noninducible VT and development of new-onset LPF block. Follow-up with clinic visits or telephonic interviews, electrocardiogram (ECG), or Holter monitoring was performed after the procedure. With a median follow-up of 85 (18,181) months, 20 patients were censored and 152 of 175 (86.86%) patients had long-term freedom from VT after a single procedure. No statistical difference in the outcome of catheter ablation of LPF-VT was found between inducible and non-inducible groups (P=0.89). Twenty-three patients exhibited recurrent LPF-VT. Seven of 23 patients developed new-onset left upper septal ventricular tachycardia that was successfully ablated. All the patients undergoing repeat procedures had freedom from VT. No procedural complications occurred.
CONCLUSIONS: Ablation of LPF-VT using the development of LPF block as the endpoint is associated with a high procedural success rate. No difference in freedom from LPF-VT was found between inducible and non-inducible patients. New-onset LPF block recovery and non-early PP-QRS interval can be the predictors of LPF-VT repeat procedure.