Scientific reports · 2024
Singlet oxygen detection in vivo is hindered by nonspecific SOSG staining.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Kadhem Zainab, Alkafeef Selma, Benov Ludmil
Аннотация
Singlet oxygen is considered an important cell damaging agent due to its propensity to react with organic compounds. This drives the interest in developing methods for determination of 1O2. Simplicity of application and high sensitivity makes fluorescent probes a popular choice for in vivo 1O2 detection. Despite its proclaimed cell-impermeability, the commercially available Singlet Oxygen Sensor Green (SOSG) is widely applied to support assertions of 1O2 involvement in cell and tissue damage. Our investigation, however, demonstrate that different microbial species and cancer cells become fluorescent when exposed to SOSG under conditions which exclude generation of 1O2. Cells, permeabilized with chlorhexidine or by heat exposure under anaerobic conditions, exhibited SOSG fluorescence. Permeabilized cells could be stained with SOSG even 24 h post-permeabilization. Since SOSG is cell impermeable, the main factor that led to fluorescent staining was plasma membrane damage. Spectral analyses of different batches of SOSG revealed that SOSG endoperoxide (SOSG-EP) did not increase even after prolonged storage under the recommended conditions. The commercial preparations of SOSG, however, were not SOSG-EP free, which can produce erroneous results when SOSG staining is used as a proof of singlet oxygen production in vivo.