MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/jcp.2004.016261

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of clinical pathology · 2004

What happens to patients with positive tissue transglutaminase and endomysium antibody results in general practice?

Sinclair D, Duncan H

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

A previous study showed that many patients with positive gut related antibodies (anti-tissue transglutaminase (TTG) and/or anti-endomysium (EMA) antibodies), indicative of coeliac disease, were not offered a duodenal biopsy, despite the recommendation of the British Society for Gastroenterology guidelines.

AIMS/

METHODS

To investigate whether the addition of a comment on the advisability of referral to a gastroenterologist and biopsy to each positive gut related antibody result would improve the referral rate to investigate possible coeliac disease.

RESULTS

The referral rate improved from 30.1% of patients who were referred and 18% subsequently biopsied before the addition of the comment, to 79.8% who were referred after the introduction of a specific laboratory comment attached to positive antibodies to TTG and/or EMA. All patients with these positive antibodies who were referred for consultant opinion were subsequently biopsied.

CONCLUSIONS

To ensure that British Society for Gastroenterology guidelines are followed, laboratories should incorporate more explicit details on the recommended course of action for general practitioners on their receipt of positive gut antibodies to TTG/EMA.

Для цитирования: Sinclair D, Duncan H. What happens to patients with positive tissue transglutaminase and endomysium antibody results in general practice?. Journal of clinical pathology. 2004. DOI: 10.1136/jcp.2004.016261.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.