MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106397

Медицинская библиотека · BMJ open · 2026

Evaluation of non-ophthalmologist-led and offline AI-assisted models for diabetic retinopathy screening in India: a pragmatic diagnostic accuracy study.

Chauhan Anshul, Vale Luke, Kankaria Ankita, Tigari Basavaraj, Kumar Sonam, Yadav Mitesh, Kumar Lakshay, Kaur Gagandeep, Bhadada Sanjay Kumar, Gupta Vishali, Duggal Mona

СтатьяPragmatic Clinical TrialПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

To assess and compare the diagnostic accuracy of non-ophthalmologist-led diabetic retinopathy screening (DRS) at health and wellness centres (HWCs) and offline artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted community-based screening, using specialist grading as the reference standard in India.

DESIGN, SETTINGS AND

PARTICIPANTS

Pragmatic diagnostic accuracy study in primary healthcare settings. The settings included HWCs and community-based screening sites in rural Block Boothgarh, Mohali District, Punjab, India. A total of 600 people with diabetes aged ≥30 years were enrolled across three screening models: (1) non-ophthalmologist-led DRS at the HWC, (2) AI-assisted smartphone-based DRS in the community and (3) standard referral-based care. Retinal images were captured using non-mydriatic fundus cameras and independently graded by two masked human graders; a senior retina specialist resolved any disagreements. The AI was assessed for its ability to detect diabetic retinopathy (DR) and referable diabetic retinopathy (RDR). Diagnostic performance metrics were reported.

RESULTS

The non-ophthalmologist-led model demonstrated 86.4% sensitivity (95% CI 65.1% to 97.1%) and 94.3% specificity (95% CI 88.5% to 97.7%) for DR detection, with an ungradability rate of 8%. For RDR, sensitivity reached 95.8% (95% CI 78.9% to 99.9%) and specificity was 93.1% (95% CI 88.0% to 96.5%). The offline AI-assisted model achieved 93.3% sensitivity (95% CI 68.1% to 99.8%) and 85.1% specificity (95% CI 76.9% to 91.2%) for RDR, but with a higher ungradability rate (38%), mainly due to cataracts and poor image quality. Both approaches effectively identified referable cases; however, the non-ophthalmologist-led model demonstrated greater accuracy and operational feasibility.

CONCLUSIONS

This study demonstrates that non-ophthalmologist-led DRS at HWCs can enhance access to primary care. Offline AI-enabled screening demonstrates potential for community use but is currently limited by image quality and binary classification outputs. Integrating both approaches may strengthen DRS coverage in resource-limited settings.

CLINICAL TRIALS REGISTRY OF INDIA: CTRI/2022/10/046283.

Для цитирования: Chauhan Anshul, Vale Luke, Kankaria Ankita, Tigari Basavaraj, Kumar Sonam, Yadav Mitesh, Kumar Lakshay, Kaur Gagandeep, Bhadada Sanjay Kumar, Gupta Vishali, Duggal Mona. Evaluation of non-ophthalmologist-led and offline AI-assisted models for diabetic retinopathy screening in India: a pragmatic diagnostic accuracy study.. BMJ open. 2026. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-106397.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.