MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/diagnostics16050737

Медицинская библиотека · Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026

Deep Learning-Based Choroidal Boundary Detection in Geographic Atrophy Using Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography.

Rahmanipour Elham, Hasan Nasiq, Gadari Adarsh, Whitley James, Sharma Soumya, Lall Shreyaa, Santos Cristian de Los, Sadeghi Elham, Bollepalli Sandeep Chandra, Vupparaboina Kiran Kumar, Savaria Mario J, Chhablani Jay

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Background/

Objectives

To evaluate the challenges and limitations of a deep learning model for automated choroidal boundary detection in eyes with geographic atrophy (GA) using spectral-domain OCT (SD-OCT), and to assess the workflow efficiency of an AI-assisted manual verification approach.

Methods

In this retrospective study, total 5723 scans (Heidelberg Spectralis) with GA were analyzed. A previously validated tool (NMI ChoroidAI) was used to segment the choroidal inner (CIB) and outer (COB) boundaries. We compared the "AI-assisted" workflow (automated segmentation followed by manual verification) against "manual segmentation only" in terms of accuracy and time consumption. Slice-wise boundary errors were graded as 0 (accurate), 1 (≤33% deviation), 2 (33-66% deviation), or 3 (>66% deviation). Outcomes included error rates and weighted F1 score (and precision where applicable). Total time for manual-only segmentation versus AI-assisted verification was recorded. -Interreader variability was assessed between the two readers using intraclass correlation coefficient.

Results

For CIB, only 5.2% of B-scans showed any deviation (strictly accurate in 94.8%), with weighted F1 score 0.97 and precision 1.00. COB was more error-prone: 19.0% of B-scans showed deviation; however, when minor deviations were considered acceptable, COB acceptability increased to 94.2% (i.e., 5.8% remained >33% deviated). Only 13.2% of B-scans required minor manual correction. For a 97-scan volume, processing time decreased from an average of 7 h (manual only) to 45 min (AI + human verification), an approximate 90% reduction in manual effort. Inter-reader agreement was high (ICC 0.923 for CIB and 0.938 for COB).

Conclusions

Although the deep learning model exhibits limitations in COB detection due to artifacts, it serves as a valuable assistive tool. Our model substantially reduces human effort, but mandatory human verification is required to correct boundary errors caused by hyper-transmission before use in clinical trials.

Для цитирования: Rahmanipour Elham, Hasan Nasiq, Gadari Adarsh, Whitley James, Sharma Soumya, Lall Shreyaa, Santos Cristian de Los, Sadeghi Elham, Bollepalli Sandeep Chandra, Vupparaboina Kiran Kumar, Savaria Mario J, Chhablani Jay. Deep Learning-Based Choroidal Boundary Detection in Geographic Atrophy Using Spectral-Domain Optical Coherence Tomography.. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland). 2026. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics16050737.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.