Eye (London, England) · 2024
Assessing large language models' accuracy in providing patient support for choroidal melanoma.
СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Anguita Rodrigo, Downie Catriona, Ferro Desideri Lorenzo, Sagoo Mandeep S
Аннотация
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy of information that patients can obtain from large language models (LLMs) when seeking answers to common questions about choroidal melanoma.
METHODS: Comparative study comparing frequently asked questions from choroidal melanoma patients and queried three major LLMs-ChatGPT 3.5, Bing AI, and DocsGPT. Answers were reviewed by three ocular oncology experts and scored as accurate, partially accurate, or inaccurate. Statistical analysis compared the quality of responses across models.
RESULTS: For medical advice questions, ChatGPT gave 92% accurate responses compared to 58% for Bing AI and DocsGPT. For pre/post-op questions, ChatGPT and Bing AI were 86% accurate while DocsGPT was 73% accurate. There were no statistically significant differences between models. ChatGPT responses were the longest while Bing AI responses were the shortest, but length did not affect accuracy. All LLMs appropriately directed patients to seek medical advice from professionals.
CONCLUSION: LLMs show promising capability to address common choroidal melanoma patient questions at generally acceptable accuracy levels. However, inconsistent, and inaccurate responses do occur, highlighting the need for improved fine-tuning and oversight before integration into clinical practice.
METHODS: Comparative study comparing frequently asked questions from choroidal melanoma patients and queried three major LLMs-ChatGPT 3.5, Bing AI, and DocsGPT. Answers were reviewed by three ocular oncology experts and scored as accurate, partially accurate, or inaccurate. Statistical analysis compared the quality of responses across models.
RESULTS: For medical advice questions, ChatGPT gave 92% accurate responses compared to 58% for Bing AI and DocsGPT. For pre/post-op questions, ChatGPT and Bing AI were 86% accurate while DocsGPT was 73% accurate. There were no statistically significant differences between models. ChatGPT responses were the longest while Bing AI responses were the shortest, but length did not affect accuracy. All LLMs appropriately directed patients to seek medical advice from professionals.
CONCLUSION: LLMs show promising capability to address common choroidal melanoma patient questions at generally acceptable accuracy levels. However, inconsistent, and inaccurate responses do occur, highlighting the need for improved fine-tuning and oversight before integration into clinical practice.