MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.03.021

Медицинская библиотека · JACC. Cardiovascular interventions · 2018

A Randomized Study of Distal Filter Protection Versus Conventional Treatment During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Attenuated Plaque Identified by Intravascular Ultrasound.

Hibi Kiyoshi, Kozuma Ken, Sonoda Shinjo, Endo Tsutomu, Tanaka Hiroyuki, Kyono Hiroyuki, Koshida Ryoji, Ishihara Takayuki, Awata Masaki, Kume Teruyoshi, Tanabe Kengo, Morino Yoshihiro, Tsukahara Kengo, Ikari Yuji, Fujii Kenshi, Yamasaki Masao, Yamanaka Takeharu, Kimura Kazuo, Isshiki Takaaki, VAMPIRE 3 Investigators

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the utility of distal protection during percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) in patients with acute coronary syndromes at high risk for distal embolization.

BACKGROUND

The results of previous clinical trials indicated that the routine use of distal protection in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction did not improve clinical outcomes. However, selective use of distal protection by means of a filter-based distal protection system has not been evaluated.

METHODS

Two hundred patients with acute coronary syndromes who had native coronary artery lesions and attenuated plaque with longitudinal length ≥5 mm on pre-PCI intravascular ultrasound were randomly assigned to undergo PCI with distal protection or conventional treatment.

RESULTS

The primary endpoint (no-reflow phenomenon) occurred in 26 patients (26.5%) in the distal protection group and 39 patients (41.7%) in the conventional treatment group (p = 0.026), and the corrected TIMI (Thrombolysis In Myocardial Infarction) frame count after revascularization was significantly lower in the distal protection group (23 vs. 30.5; p = 0.0003). The incidence of cardiac death, cardiac arrest, cardiogenic shock after revascularization requiring defibrillation, cardiopulmonary resuscitation, or extracorporeal membrane oxygenation was significantly lower in the distal protection group than in the conventional treatment group (0% vs. 5.2%; p = 0.028).

CONCLUSIONS

The use of distal embolic protection applied with a filter device decreased the incidence of the no-reflow phenomenon and was associated with fewer serious adverse cardiac events after revascularization than conventional PCI in patients with acute coronary syndromes with attenuated plaque ≥5 mm in length. (Assessment of Distal Protection Device in Patients at High Risk for Distal Embolism in Acute Coronary Syndrome [ACS] [VAMPIRE3]; NCT01460966).

Для цитирования: Hibi Kiyoshi, Kozuma Ken, Sonoda Shinjo, Endo Tsutomu, Tanaka Hiroyuki, Kyono Hiroyuki, Koshida Ryoji, Ishihara Takayuki, Awata Masaki, Kume Teruyoshi, Tanabe Kengo, Morino Yoshihiro, Tsukahara Kengo, Ikari Yuji, Fujii Kenshi, Yamasaki Masao, Yamanaka Takeharu, Kimura Kazuo, Isshiki Takaaki, VAMPIRE 3 Investigators. A Randomized Study of Distal Filter Protection Versus Conventional Treatment During Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Patients With Attenuated Plaque Identified by Intravascular Ultrasound.. JACC. Cardiovascular interventions. 2018. DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2018.03.021.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.