Journal of clinical pathology · 2024
Nuclear staining for pan-Trk by immunohistochemistry is highly specific for secretory carcinoma of breast: pan-Trk in various subtypes of breast carcinoma.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ye Qiqi, Chen Hui, Han Cody, Peng Yan, Huang Xiao, Sun Hongxia, Wu Yun, Albarracin Constance T, Middleton Lavinia P, Sahin Aysegul A, Huo Lei, Ding Qingqing
Аннотация
AIMS: Secretory carcinoma of breast (SCB) typically harbours ETV6-NTRK3 gene fusion. Pan-Trk immunohistochemistry analysis (IHC) has been shown to be sensitive for SCB diagnosis. However, weak focal pan-Trk nuclear staining was previously found in 10% of non-secretory breast carcinomas. To further examine pan-Trk IHC specificity, we evaluated pan-Trk staining in various breast carcinoma subtypes.
METHODS: The study cohort consisted of 346 invasive breast carcinomas (IBCs), including 8 SCBs and 48 triple-negative histological mimickers (36 metaplastic carcinomas, including 12 matrix-producing carcinomas; 5 adenoid cystic carcinomas; 5 apocrine carcinomas; 2 acinic cell carcinomas), 101 triple-negative IBCs of no special type, 101 estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/HER2-negative IBCs and 88 HER2-positive IBCs. Six salivary gland secretory carcinomas were also included. Pan-Trk IHC was performed on tumours using a rabbit monoclonal pan-Trk antibody. Any nuclear staining in the invasive carcinoma cells was considered positive.
RESULTS: All 14 secretory carcinomas from breast and salivary gland exhibited moderate to strong pan-Trk nuclear staining. In contrast, no pan-Trk nuclear staining was identified in any of the 338 non-secretory IBCs. Focal cytoplasmic pan-Trk staining was observed in nine non-secretory IBCs (2.7%), and was considered nonspecific and negative.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that pan-Trk nuclear staining is highly specific for SCB. In low-grade to intermediate-grade IBCs that share histological features with SCB, adding pan-Trk to a routing panel of estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor/HER2 is highly diagnostic. Our results also support using pan-Trk IHC to differentiate SCB from its triple-negative histological mimickers, such as adenoid cystic carcinoma, matrix-producing carcinoma, apocrine carcinoma and acinic cell carcinoma.
METHODS: The study cohort consisted of 346 invasive breast carcinomas (IBCs), including 8 SCBs and 48 triple-negative histological mimickers (36 metaplastic carcinomas, including 12 matrix-producing carcinomas; 5 adenoid cystic carcinomas; 5 apocrine carcinomas; 2 acinic cell carcinomas), 101 triple-negative IBCs of no special type, 101 estrogen receptor (ER)-positive/HER2-negative IBCs and 88 HER2-positive IBCs. Six salivary gland secretory carcinomas were also included. Pan-Trk IHC was performed on tumours using a rabbit monoclonal pan-Trk antibody. Any nuclear staining in the invasive carcinoma cells was considered positive.
RESULTS: All 14 secretory carcinomas from breast and salivary gland exhibited moderate to strong pan-Trk nuclear staining. In contrast, no pan-Trk nuclear staining was identified in any of the 338 non-secretory IBCs. Focal cytoplasmic pan-Trk staining was observed in nine non-secretory IBCs (2.7%), and was considered nonspecific and negative.
CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that pan-Trk nuclear staining is highly specific for SCB. In low-grade to intermediate-grade IBCs that share histological features with SCB, adding pan-Trk to a routing panel of estrogen receptor/progesterone receptor/HER2 is highly diagnostic. Our results also support using pan-Trk IHC to differentiate SCB from its triple-negative histological mimickers, such as adenoid cystic carcinoma, matrix-producing carcinoma, apocrine carcinoma and acinic cell carcinoma.