Muscle & nerve · 2015
High-resolution ultrasound in ulnar neuropathy at the elbow: A prospective study.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ellegaard Hanne R, Fuglsang-Frederiksen Anders, Hess Alexander, Johnsen Birger, Qerama Erisela
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION: We examined the role of ultrasound in diagnosing and localizing ulnar neuropathy (UN) at the elbow.
METHODS: Forty-one patients referred for UN and 43 healthy subjects were included. Cross-sectional area (CSA) of the ulnar nerve was measured by ultrasound at 5 locations across the elbow and at the wrist. Patients underwent near-nerve conduction studies (N-NCS).
RESULTS: Ultrasound (US) had a sensitivity of 80.5%, N-NCS had a sensitivity of 70.7%, and combined sensitivity was 85.4% in diagnosing UN. Using N-NCS as a reference standard, US reached a sensitivity of 93.1% and a specificity of 50.0% in diagnosing UN, and a sensitivity of 77.3% and a specificity of 42.9% in localizing UN at the elbow. There was a reduction in mean CSA at 3-month follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: N-NCS and US are complementary methods and have the potential to increase the sensitivity for diagnosing and localizing UN at the elbow.
METHODS: Forty-one patients referred for UN and 43 healthy subjects were included. Cross-sectional area (CSA) of the ulnar nerve was measured by ultrasound at 5 locations across the elbow and at the wrist. Patients underwent near-nerve conduction studies (N-NCS).
RESULTS: Ultrasound (US) had a sensitivity of 80.5%, N-NCS had a sensitivity of 70.7%, and combined sensitivity was 85.4% in diagnosing UN. Using N-NCS as a reference standard, US reached a sensitivity of 93.1% and a specificity of 50.0% in diagnosing UN, and a sensitivity of 77.3% and a specificity of 42.9% in localizing UN at the elbow. There was a reduction in mean CSA at 3-month follow-up.
CONCLUSIONS: N-NCS and US are complementary methods and have the potential to increase the sensitivity for diagnosing and localizing UN at the elbow.