MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3390/diagnostics14222568

Медицинская библиотека · Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024

Evaluating Factors Affecting Mean Glandular Dose in Mammography: Insights from a Retrospective Study in Dubai.

Noor Kaltham Abdulwahid Mohammad, Norsuddin Norhashimah Mohd, Karim Muhammad Khalis Abdul, Isa Iza Nurzawani Che, Ulaganathan Vaidehi

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND/

OBJECTIVE

This study evaluates the mean glandular dose (MGD) in mammography screening for women aged 40-69 in Dubai, based on a retrospective analysis of a dose survey involving 2599 participants.

METHODS

MGD was calculated using the Dance formula.

RESULTS

The average MGD was 0.96 ± 0.39 mGy for mediolateral oblique (MLO) views and 0.81 ± 0.33 mGy for craniocaudal (CC) views. Weak inverse correlations were found between age and organ dose (OD) for both views, while a direct relationship was observed between breast thickness and entrance skin dose (ESD). In adjusted models, ESD was strongly associated with MGD (β = 1.04, 95% CI: 0.97, 1.09), while OD showed a moderate association (β = 0.44, 95% CI: 0.40, 0.49). Significant variations in ESD, OD, and MGD were noted across age groups and breast thicknesses.

CONCLUSIONS

Lower MGD indicates reduced radiation exposure risk, while higher MGD in MLO views suggests improved imaging quality. Monitoring and optimizing MGD are essential for enhancing patient safety and screening efficacy.

Для цитирования: Noor Kaltham Abdulwahid Mohammad, Norsuddin Norhashimah Mohd, Karim Muhammad Khalis Abdul, Isa Iza Nurzawani Che, Ulaganathan Vaidehi. Evaluating Factors Affecting Mean Glandular Dose in Mammography: Insights from a Retrospective Study in Dubai.. Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland). 2024. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics14222568.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.