MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1093/noajnl/vdae171

Медицинская библиотека · Neuro-oncology advances · 2024

Development of the pediatric neuro-oncology services assessment aid: An assessment tool for pediatric neuro-oncology service delivery capacity.

Rajagopal Revathi, Diaz Coronado Rosdali, Hamid Syed Ahmer, Navarro Martin Del Campo Regina, Boop Frederick, Bag Asim, Benito Reséndiz Alma Edith, Bhat K Vasudeva, Campos Danny, Chang Kenneth, Cirt Ramona, Dhyani Rahmartani Ludi, Foo Jen Chun, Hoveyan Julieta, Lucas John T, Ngcana Thandeka, Ul Ain Rahat, Omran Nuha, Osorio Diana S, Qureshi Bilal Mazhar, Sabin Noah D, Schandorf Ernestina, Bankah Patrick, Dadzie Mary-Ann, Gbadamos Hafisatu, Sharafeldin Hend, Somathilaka Mahendra, Yang Peiyi, Atteby Jean-Jacques Yao, Zhang Anan, Salman Zeena, Gonzalez Miriam, Friedrich Paola, Rodriguez-Galindo Carlos, Qaddoumi Ibrahim, Moreira Daniel C

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

To enhance the quality of care available for children with central nervous system (CNS) tumors across the world, a systematic evaluation of capacity is needed to identify gaps and prioritize interventions. To that end, we created the pediatric neuro-oncology (PNO) resource assessment aid (PANORAMA) tool.

METHODS

The development of PANORAMA encompassed 3 phases: operationalization, consensus building, and piloting. PANORAMA aimed to capture the elements of the PNO care continuum through domains with weighted assessments reflecting their importance. Responses were ordinally scored to reflect the level of satisfaction. PANORAMA was revised based on feedback at various phases to improve its relevance, usability, and clarity.

RESULTS

The operationalization phase identified 14 domains by using 252 questions. The consensus phase involved 15 experts (6 pediatric oncologists, 3 radiation oncologists, 2 neurosurgeons, 2 radiologists, and 2 pathologists). The consensus phase validated the identified domains, questions, and scoring methodology. The PANORAMA domains included national context, hospital infrastructure, organization and service integration, human resources, financing, laboratory, neurosurgery, diagnostic imaging, pathology, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, supportive care, and patient outcomes. PANORAMA was piloted at 13 institutions in 12 countries, representing diverse patient care contexts. Face validity was assessed by examining the correlation between the estimated score by respondents and calculated PANORAMA scores for each domain (r = 0.67, P < .0001).

CONCLUSIONS

PANORAMA was developed through a systematic, collaborative approach, ensuring its relevance to evaluate core elements of PNO service capacity. Distribution of PANORAMA will enable quantitative service evaluations across institutions, facilitating benchmarking and the prioritization of interventions.

Для цитирования: Rajagopal Revathi, Diaz Coronado Rosdali, Hamid Syed Ahmer, Navarro Martin Del Campo Regina, Boop Frederick, Bag Asim, Benito Reséndiz Alma Edith, Bhat K Vasudeva, Campos Danny, Chang Kenneth, Cirt Ramona, Dhyani Rahmartani Ludi, Foo Jen Chun, Hoveyan Julieta, Lucas John T, Ngcana Thandeka, Ul Ain Rahat, Omran Nuha, Osorio Diana S, Qureshi Bilal Mazhar, Sabin Noah D, Schandorf Ernestina, Bankah Patrick, Dadzie Mary-Ann, Gbadamos Hafisatu, Sharafeldin Hend, Somathilaka Mahendra, Yang Peiyi, Atteby Jean-Jacques Yao, Zhang Anan, Salman Zeena, Gonzalez Miriam, Friedrich Paola, Rodriguez-Galindo Carlos, Qaddoumi Ibrahim, Moreira Daniel C. Development of the pediatric neuro-oncology services assessment aid: An assessment tool for pediatric neuro-oncology service delivery capacity.. Neuro-oncology advances. 2024. DOI: 10.1093/noajnl/vdae171.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.