PloS one · 2026
Survival following sublobar resection after neoadjuvant therapy for T1N1-2M0 lung cancer.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Reddington Hayley, Emmerick Isabel, Diaz Collante Javier, Maini Aniket, Kanzaria Raghav, Crawford Allison, Phillips William, Maxfield Mark, Uy Karl, Lou Feiran
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Lobectomy remains the standard surgical approach for resectable non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), but sublobar resection is increasingly considered, particularly for small, early-stage tumors. The role of sublobar resection after neoadjuvant therapy is unclear. We compared survival after sublobar resection versus lobectomy among patients with T1N1-2M0 NSCLC treated with neoadjuvant therapy.
METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database (2011-2021), we identified patients ≥18 years with clinical stage T1N1-2M0 NSCLC who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, chemoradiation, or chemoimmunotherapy followed by resection within 8 months. Patients with pneumonectomy, metastases, positive margins were excluded. Patients were grouped by resection type: sublobar (wedge or segmentectomy) vs. lobectomy (including bilobectomy and extended). Survival was assessed via Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox regression.
RESULTS: Of 2,257 patients, 148 (6.6%) underwent sublobar resection. Compared to lobectomy, sublobar resection was associated with fewer lymph nodes examined (24% vs. 54% with >10 nodes, p < 0.001) and shorter hospital stays (3.9 vs. 5.3 days, p < 0.001). Stage distribution was similar. One-year survival was comparable for both groups in stage II and III disease. At 5 years, survival was lower for stage III patients undergoing sublobar resection (48.6% vs. 59.9%, p < 0.01), with adjusted analysis confirming worse survival (HR = 1.41, p = 0.013).
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with T1N1-2M0 NSCLC treated with neoadjuvant therapy, sublobar resection was associated with similar short-term but inferior long-term survival compared to lobectomy. Lobectomy remains preferred for patients with adequate reserve, though sublobar resection may be appropriate for select patients.
METHODS: Using the National Cancer Database (2011-2021), we identified patients ≥18 years with clinical stage T1N1-2M0 NSCLC who received neoadjuvant chemotherapy, chemoradiation, or chemoimmunotherapy followed by resection within 8 months. Patients with pneumonectomy, metastases, positive margins were excluded. Patients were grouped by resection type: sublobar (wedge or segmentectomy) vs. lobectomy (including bilobectomy and extended). Survival was assessed via Kaplan-Meier analysis and multivariable Cox regression.
RESULTS: Of 2,257 patients, 148 (6.6%) underwent sublobar resection. Compared to lobectomy, sublobar resection was associated with fewer lymph nodes examined (24% vs. 54% with >10 nodes, p < 0.001) and shorter hospital stays (3.9 vs. 5.3 days, p < 0.001). Stage distribution was similar. One-year survival was comparable for both groups in stage II and III disease. At 5 years, survival was lower for stage III patients undergoing sublobar resection (48.6% vs. 59.9%, p < 0.01), with adjusted analysis confirming worse survival (HR = 1.41, p = 0.013).
CONCLUSIONS: Among patients with T1N1-2M0 NSCLC treated with neoadjuvant therapy, sublobar resection was associated with similar short-term but inferior long-term survival compared to lobectomy. Lobectomy remains preferred for patients with adequate reserve, though sublobar resection may be appropriate for select patients.