MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1080/01913120050176725

Медицинская библиотека · Ultrastructural pathology · 2000

Meningioma with granulofilamentous inclusions.

Horiguchi H, Hirose T, Sano T, Nagahiro S, Seki K, Fujimoto N, Kaneko F, Kusaka K

Клинический случайСтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

The authors report a case of intracranial meningioma with granulofilamentous inclusions. A 50-year-old man had right trigeminal neuralgia due to trigeminal nerve compression by a petroclival tumor and received tumor resection. Microscopically, tumor cells containing eccentric nuclei and intracytoplasmic hyaline inclusions were arranged in sheets and whorls. The inclusions were negative for periodic acid-Schiff reaction. No histological anaplasia was seen. Immunohistochemistry showed epithelial membrane antigen reactivity on the cytoplasmic membrane. Immunoreactivity for vimentin was recognized in cytoplasm adjacent to inclusions. However, confocal laser microscopic study revealed immunoreactivity for vimentin even inside some inclusions. Ultrastructurally, interdigitation of cytoplasmic processes and desmosomes connecting adjacent cells were noted. Inclusions were composed of numerous fine osmiophilic granules attached by intermediates filaments. These findings were consistent with a meningioma with the granulofilamentous inclusions described earlier. The findings demonstrated by confocal laser microscopy and electron microscopy suggest that these granular materials may be the metabolic products of vimentin filaments.

Для цитирования: Horiguchi H, Hirose T, Sano T, Nagahiro S, Seki K, Fujimoto N, Kaneko F, Kusaka K. Meningioma with granulofilamentous inclusions.. Ultrastructural pathology. 2000. DOI: 10.1080/01913120050176725.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.