DOI 10.1016/j.purol.2007.10.003
[Evaluation of the practical skills of final year medical students: example of bladder catheterization].
Аннотация
INTRODUCTION
When performed incorrectly, bladder catheterization can cause iatrogenic complications, especially urinary tract infections and trauma. The objective of this study was to determine the capacity of final year medical students to perform the various bladder catheterization techniques.
MATERIAL AND
METHODS
Between January and March 2007, a catheterization self-administered questionnaire was sent by e-mail to a representative sample of final year medical students, two months before the national classifying examination.
RESULTS
Two hundred and seventy-seven questionnaires were returned and analysed. Seventy-two students (26%) considered that they were able to perform bladder catheterization in males and 106 (38.3%) in females at the end of their medical training. Seventy-one out of 277 (25.5%) students had completed an urology term during their training and 53.5% of them considered that they had acquired the indwelling catheter technique in males (p<0.001) versus 39 (54.9%) in females (p<0.001). Seventy-three students (26.4%) considered that they were able to perform intermittent catheterization in males or females and only one student was able to perform suprapubic catheterization.
CONCLUSION
Teaching of catheterization procedures is inappropriate during medical training and young doctors consider themselves unable to perform these techniques at the end of their training. This is unfortunate, as all doctors should be able to perform catheterization as part of their daily practice, especially in hospital. This study indicates the need for improved teaching of essential medical procedures during undergraduate medical training.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.