Journal of cardiovascular medicine (Hagerstown, Md.) · 2013
Long-term independent predictors of positive response to cardiac resynchronization therapy.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Toniolo Mauro, Zanotto Gabriele, Rossi Andrea, Tomasi Luca, Prioli Maria A, Vassanelli Corrado
Аннотация
AIMS: Cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) is currently considered an important breakthrough in the treatment of selected patients with refractory heart failure. However, long-term predictors of mortality, morbidity and time to recovery of ventricular function for those patients who respond positively to CRT remain poorly investigated.
METHODS: This is a retrospective follow-up study involving one hospital. Between August 2004 and October 2008, 211 consecutive patients with refractory heart failure received a CRT device in the Cardiology Division of Ospedale Civile Maggiore in Verona. The clinical characteristics studied were age, sex, heart rhythm, left ventricular end-systolic volume/body surface area (LVESV/BSA), left ventricular ejection fraction, QRS duration, type of bundle-branch block, cause, New York Heart Failure Association functional class, pharmacological therapy and lead position. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of several baseline characteristics on long-term prognosis in heart failure patients treated with CRT.
RESULTS: Nonischemic cause, left bundle-branch block and a basal LVESV/BSA of 106 ml/m or less were the only independent predictors of a positive response to CRT (P < 0.005). Additionally, a reduction in LVESV/BSA after CRT was associated both with increased survival and reduced rehospitalization for heart failure (P < 0.005).
CONCLUSION: A better selection of patients on the basis of cause, type of bundle-branch block and basal LVESV/BSA can increase the number of patients that would benefit from CRT.
METHODS: This is a retrospective follow-up study involving one hospital. Between August 2004 and October 2008, 211 consecutive patients with refractory heart failure received a CRT device in the Cardiology Division of Ospedale Civile Maggiore in Verona. The clinical characteristics studied were age, sex, heart rhythm, left ventricular end-systolic volume/body surface area (LVESV/BSA), left ventricular ejection fraction, QRS duration, type of bundle-branch block, cause, New York Heart Failure Association functional class, pharmacological therapy and lead position. The objective of this study was to evaluate the effect of several baseline characteristics on long-term prognosis in heart failure patients treated with CRT.
RESULTS: Nonischemic cause, left bundle-branch block and a basal LVESV/BSA of 106 ml/m or less were the only independent predictors of a positive response to CRT (P < 0.005). Additionally, a reduction in LVESV/BSA after CRT was associated both with increased survival and reduced rehospitalization for heart failure (P < 0.005).
CONCLUSION: A better selection of patients on the basis of cause, type of bundle-branch block and basal LVESV/BSA can increase the number of patients that would benefit from CRT.