Irish journal of medical science · 2021
Frequency of masked hypertension in patients with nonfunctioning adrenal incidentalomas with normal and high normal blood pressure.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Yılmaz Fatih, Sözel Hasan, Keleş Meryem, Yılmaz Üstün
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES: Nonfunctioning adrenal incidentalomas (NFAIs) are associated with increased cardiovascular risk, but the frequency of masked hypertension (MH) is uncertain in these patients. This study aimed to evaluate the prevalence of MH by ambulatory blood pressure monitoring in patients with NFAIs.
METHODS: The study included a total of 85 individuals: 43 patients with NFAIs and 42 controls of similar age, gender, BMI, smoking, and diabetes. The office BP and ABPM parameters of the NFAI and controls were measured. Biochemical, hormonal, and radiological data were obtained retrospectively in the NFAI group.
RESULTS: There were no statistically significant difference between the NFAI and control groups in relation to the office SBP (134.4 ± 37.2 mmHg vs 133.1 ± 35.8 mmHg, p = 0.273) and office DBP (87.4 ± 14.5 mmHg vs 86.8 ± 13.7 mmHg, p = 0.318). Besides, normal (28% vs 28.6%, p = 0.176) and high normal blood pressure (72% vs 71.4%, p = 0.332) rates were similar. The prevalence of MH was significantly higher in patients with NFAI than in controls (25.5% vs 9.5%, p = 0.037). MH was significantly associated with diabetes odds ratio (OR) = 2.07, p = 0.044, office SBP (OR = 1.41, p = 0.046), smoking (OR = 1.46, p = 0.031), BMI (OR = 1.17, p = 0.037), and morning cortisol (OR = 1.21, p = 0.039).
CONCLUSION: The prevalence of MH in the NFAI patient's was higher than in the control group. Patients with NFAI with high normal blood pressure should be evaluated for MH.
METHODS: The study included a total of 85 individuals: 43 patients with NFAIs and 42 controls of similar age, gender, BMI, smoking, and diabetes. The office BP and ABPM parameters of the NFAI and controls were measured. Biochemical, hormonal, and radiological data were obtained retrospectively in the NFAI group.
RESULTS: There were no statistically significant difference between the NFAI and control groups in relation to the office SBP (134.4 ± 37.2 mmHg vs 133.1 ± 35.8 mmHg, p = 0.273) and office DBP (87.4 ± 14.5 mmHg vs 86.8 ± 13.7 mmHg, p = 0.318). Besides, normal (28% vs 28.6%, p = 0.176) and high normal blood pressure (72% vs 71.4%, p = 0.332) rates were similar. The prevalence of MH was significantly higher in patients with NFAI than in controls (25.5% vs 9.5%, p = 0.037). MH was significantly associated with diabetes odds ratio (OR) = 2.07, p = 0.044, office SBP (OR = 1.41, p = 0.046), smoking (OR = 1.46, p = 0.031), BMI (OR = 1.17, p = 0.037), and morning cortisol (OR = 1.21, p = 0.039).
CONCLUSION: The prevalence of MH in the NFAI patient's was higher than in the control group. Patients with NFAI with high normal blood pressure should be evaluated for MH.