MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1001/jama.299.4.409

Медицинская библиотека · JAMA · 2008

Comparison of paclitaxel- and sirolimus-eluting stents in everyday clinical practice: the SORT OUT II randomized trial.

Galløe Anders M, Thuesen Leif, Kelbaek Henning, Thayssen Per, Rasmussen Klaus, Hansen Peter R, Bligaard Niels, Saunamäki Kari, Junker Anders, Aarøe Jens, Abildgaard Ulrik, Ravkilde Jan, Engstrøm Thomas, Jensen Jan S, Andersen Henning R, Bøtker Hans E, Galatius Søren, Kristensen Steen D, Madsen Jan K, Krusell Lars R, Abildstrøm Steen Z, Stephansen Ghita B, Lassen Jens F, SORT OUT II Investigators

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

CONTEXT: Approval of drug-eluting coronary stents was based on results of relatively small trials of selected patients; however, in routine practice, stents are used in a broader spectrum of patients.

OBJECTIVE

To compare the first 2 commercially available drug-eluting stents-sirolimus-eluting and paclitaxel-eluting-for prevention of symptom-driven clinical end points, using a study design reflecting everyday clinical practice.

DESIGN, SETTING, AND PATIENTS: Randomized, blinded trial conducted August 2004 to January 2006 at 5 university hospitals in Denmark. Patients were 2098 men and women (mean [SD] age, 63.6 [10.8] years) treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) and randomized to receive either sirolimus-eluting (n = 1065) or paclitaxel-eluting (n = 1033) stents. Indications for PCI included ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), non-STEMI or unstable angina pectoris, and stable angina.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary end point was a composite clinical end point of major adverse cardiac events, defined as either cardiac death, acute myocardial infarction, target lesion revascularization, or target vessel revascularization. Secondary end points included individual components of the composite end point, all-cause mortality, and stent thrombosis.

RESULTS

The sirolimus- and the paclitaxel-eluting stent groups did not differ significantly in major adverse cardiac events (98 [9.3%] vs 114 [11.2%]; hazard ratio, 0.83 [95% confidence interval, 0.63-1.08]; P = .16) or in any of the secondary end points. The stent thrombosis rates were 27 (2.5%) and 30 (2.9%) (hazard ratio, 0.87 [95% confidence interval, 0.52-1.46]; P = .60), respectively.

CONCLUSION

In this practical randomized trial, there were no significant differences in clinical outcomes between patients receiving sirolimus- and paclitaxel-eluting stents.

TRIAL REGISTRATION: clinicaltrials.gov Identifier: NCT00388934.

Для цитирования: Galløe Anders M, Thuesen Leif, Kelbaek Henning, Thayssen Per, Rasmussen Klaus, Hansen Peter R, Bligaard Niels, Saunamäki Kari, Junker Anders, Aarøe Jens, Abildgaard Ulrik, Ravkilde Jan, Engstrøm Thomas, Jensen Jan S, Andersen Henning R, Bøtker Hans E, Galatius Søren, Kristensen Steen D, Madsen Jan K, Krusell Lars R, Abildstrøm Steen Z, Stephansen Ghita B, Lassen Jens F, SORT OUT II Investigators. Comparison of paclitaxel- and sirolimus-eluting stents in everyday clinical practice: the SORT OUT II randomized trial.. JAMA. 2008. DOI: 10.1001/jama.299.4.409.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.