Scottish medical journal · 2007
Predicting outcome in patients with acute coronary syndrome: evaluation of B-type natriuretic peptide and the global registry of acute coronary events (GRACE) risk score.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Sinclair H, Paterson M, Walker S, Beckett G, Fox K A A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Accurate risk stratification soon after admission for patients with acute coronary syndromes (ACS) is vital in guiding management. Clinical risk scores and B-type natriuretic peptide (BNP) can predict mortality and re-infarction in ACS, but it is unknown whether BNP provides prognostic information over and above that of the clinical risk scores.
METHODS: 142 unselected patients with ACS were prospectively studied. BNP was measured and patients were stratified according to BNP and Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score. In-hospital and 30-day events were characterised.
RESULTS: 20.4% of ACS subjects had ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI), 14.1%, non-ST elevation MI and 65.5% unstable angina. Elevated BNP predicted in-hospital and 30-day heart failure (p<0.01), and the risk of in-hospital recurrent ACS (p<0.05). Increasing GRACE score predicted in-hospital recurrent ACS (p<0.05), heart failure (p<0.001), arrhythmias (p<0.05) and angioplasty (p<0.05). GRACE score also predicted 30-day heart failure (p<0.05). In contrast, the predictive accuracy of troponin elevation was less robust.
CONCLUSION: BNP and the GRACE score predict complementary outcomes from ACS, but both predicted heart failure. BNP is a powerful indicator of heart failure in patients with ACS and provides prognostic information above and beyond conventional biomarkers and risk scores.
METHODS: 142 unselected patients with ACS were prospectively studied. BNP was measured and patients were stratified according to BNP and Global Registry of Acute Coronary Events (GRACE) score. In-hospital and 30-day events were characterised.
RESULTS: 20.4% of ACS subjects had ST-elevation myocardial infarction (MI), 14.1%, non-ST elevation MI and 65.5% unstable angina. Elevated BNP predicted in-hospital and 30-day heart failure (p<0.01), and the risk of in-hospital recurrent ACS (p<0.05). Increasing GRACE score predicted in-hospital recurrent ACS (p<0.05), heart failure (p<0.001), arrhythmias (p<0.05) and angioplasty (p<0.05). GRACE score also predicted 30-day heart failure (p<0.05). In contrast, the predictive accuracy of troponin elevation was less robust.
CONCLUSION: BNP and the GRACE score predict complementary outcomes from ACS, but both predicted heart failure. BNP is a powerful indicator of heart failure in patients with ACS and provides prognostic information above and beyond conventional biomarkers and risk scores.