MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1089/neu.2006.0222

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of neurotrauma · 2007

Role of spinal inhibitory mechanisms in whiplash injuries.

Lo Yew-Long, Tan Yam-Eng, Fook-Chong Stephanie, Boolsambatra Pensie, Yue Wai-Mun, Chan Ling-Ling, Tan Seang-Beng

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Whiplash injury, commonly encountered in road traffic accidents, is a major cause of morbidity. Its pathophysiology is not well understood, and diagnosis remains clinical. Imaging and electrophysiological methods have not provided objective diagnostic evidence. Availability of a sensitive and specific diagnostic method would be of high clinical interest. We studied 20 consecutive patients with chronic whiplash injury. Despite persistent symptoms, most had minimal neurological findings. Cutaneous silent period (CSP), a nociceptive spinal inhibitory electromyographic reflex, showed 90% sensitivity and 90% specificity for its diagnosis. In contrast, only two patients (10%) had abnormal transcranial magnetic stimulation findings, and another two (10%) showed abnormal electromyography. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) showed cervical cord abnormalities in only two of 20 (10%) patients. None of the patients had abnormal somatosensory evoked potential studies. Our findings suggest that neurological dysfunction of whiplash may occur at several possible spinal cord localities in the CSP functional pathway. The use of this simple, quick, and sensitive method is advocated in the diagnostic work up of whiplash injury.

Для цитирования: Lo Yew-Long, Tan Yam-Eng, Fook-Chong Stephanie, Boolsambatra Pensie, Yue Wai-Mun, Chan Ling-Ling, Tan Seang-Beng. Role of spinal inhibitory mechanisms in whiplash injuries.. Journal of neurotrauma. 2007. DOI: 10.1089/neu.2006.0222.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.