DOI 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2018.01.018
Repeat Robotic Endoscopic Mitral Valve Operation: A Safe and Effective Strategy.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND
Mitral valve reoperation is necessary in a finite percentage of patients. With growth in robotic mitral valve operations, reoperative strategies need to be developed. A review of institutional mitral valve reoperations after a previous robotic approach was undertaken.
METHODS
From January 2006 through April 2017, 1,853 patients underwent an initial robotic mitral valve operation by a dedicated robotic team. During this interval, 54 of these patients (2.9%) required mitral reoperation at our institution. The prospectively collected operative, echocardiographic, videoscopic, and outcome data for these patients were retrospectively reviewed to assess the feasibility, efficacy, and safety of a repeat robotic mitral valve operation.
RESULTS
Reoperative mitral operation after a previous robotic procedure was completed robotically in 50 patients (92.6%). Robotic mitral re-repair was achieved in 36 of the 50 patients (72%), including 33 of the 39 patients (85%) with degenerative disease. Conversion of a previous repair to a replacement was performed in 12 patients (24%) and re-replacement in 2 patients (4%). No patients were converted from a robotic approach to a thoracotomy or sternotomy approach. There were no deaths or strokes in this series. Major morbidity occurred in 1 patient (2%) in the repeat robotic group. Sternotomy for reoperation was required in 4 patients (7%) due to right chest access or peripheral perfusion limitations.
CONCLUSIONS
Repeat robotic mitral operation after a previous robotic approach is feasible and appears to be an effective and safe strategy in a high percentage of patients when performed by an experienced robotic team.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.