Value of endotracheal tube safety in laryngeal laser surgery.
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND
OBJECTIVES
Due to the increased popularity of laryngeal laser therapy, surgeons and anesthesiologists are inevitably confronted with questions concerning the choice of the most efficient endotracheal tube (ETT) for laryngeal laser surgery, especially with regard to possible endolaryngeal tube fires, or combustions. The purpose of this study was to determine the current practice in endolaryngeal laser surgery in Germany.
STUDY DESIGN/MATERIALS AND
METHODS
A questionnaire was sent to 152 ENT Departments in Germany, care was taken that the responders could send back the questionnaire anonymously. Among other questions the participants were asked for the number of lasersurgical treatments of the larynx performed in the past, the usual type of ETTs in use, whether other safety precautions were taken during CO2 laser surgery of the larynx and for intraoperative complications like tube ignition, fires or combustions.
RESULTS
Eighty six of the 152 addressed ENT departments replied. In laryngeal laser surgery, 59/86 departments regularly use special laser tubes in daily routine (74.5%). In about 20,000 lasersurgical procedures, 15 incidents of ETT fire have been reported. In six of the reported 15 cases a tube fire occurred despite the fact that special laser tubes had been utilized.
CONCLUSIONS
The present study could demonstrate that the use of special laser tubes does not necessarily protect against ETT fire. Thus, even when using special laser tubes other safety measures should be taken. In view of the maximum safety for the patient it has to be stated, that the safety during surgery correlates definitely with the experience of the surgeon. The weakest point of ETTs is usually situated in the cuff region.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.