Low eosinophils and their dynamic as a predictor of death in patients with infections: a systematic review and meta-analysis of cohort studies.

BACKGROUND

Eosinophils prognostic significance in predicting mortality has become particularly notable during the COVID-19 pandemic. We aimed to evaluate the prognostic value of peripheral low eosinophil (eosinopenia) with focus on their dynamics (eosinophil recovery) in patients with infections.

METHODS

We searched databases (MEDLINE, Embase, Scopus, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Library) and additional sources from inception to 1 December 2023. Cohort studies involving adult patients hospitalized with infections were evaluated using dual-reviewer methodology.

RESULTS

Out of 15,066 screened papers, 151 studies met the inclusion criteria, with 107 focused on COVID-19, 14 on sepsis, 9 on Clostridioides difficile, 6 on acute COPD exacerbations, and 17 on other infections. The majority of studies reported significantly lower admission eosinophil levels in non-survivors compared to survivors. Random-effects model meta-analysis showed mean eosinophil difference between deceased and survivors -15.31 (95% CI: -18.72 to -11.90) for COVID-19 and -44.6 (95% CI: -95.62 to 6.41) for sepsis (I2 > 90%). Mortality with eosinopenia showed low certainty of evidence for C. difficile (0 cells/mm³ cut-off: RR 2.35; 95% CI: 1.84-2.99) and very low for COVID-19 when considering different cut-offs (0 cells/mm³: RR 2.37; 95% CI: 1.86-3.01; 20 cells/mm³: RR 2.90; 95% CI: 1.59-5.28; 50 cells/mm³: RR 2.70; 95% CI: 1.33-5.49). Survivors generally showed an increase in eosinophil counts within the first 2-5 days of hospitalization, while the deceased had persistently low levels.

CONCLUSIONS

Eosinopenia, particularly the trajectory of eosinophil recovery, may serve as a cost-effective and accessible prognostic marker for mortality in patients with infections.