British journal of clinical pharmacology · 2015
Moxifloxacin-induced QTc interval prolongations in healthy male Japanese and Caucasian volunteers: a direct comparison in a thorough QT study.
СтатьяРандомизированное исследованиеНазвание и аннотация: Перевод в очереди
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Morganroth Joel, Wang Yaning, Thorn Michael, Kumagai Yuji, Harris Stuart, Stockbridge Norman, Kleiman Robert, Shah Rashmi
Аннотация
AIM: We investigated whether moxifloxacin-induced QTc prolongations in Japanese and Caucasian healthy male volunteers were significantly different.
METHODS: A two period, randomized, crossover, ICH-E14-compliant thorough QT (TQT) study compared placebo-corrected changes in QTc interval from baseline (ΔΔQTc F) and concentration-effect relationships following administration of placebo and 400 mg moxifloxacin to 40 healthy male volunteers from each ethnic population. The point estimates of ΔΔQTc F for each population, and the difference between the two, were calculated at a geometric mean Cmax of moxifloxacin using a linear mixed effects model. The concentration-effect slopes of the two populations were also compared. Equivalence was concluded if the two-sided 90% confidence interval of the difference in ΔΔQTc F was contained within -5 ms to +5 ms limits and the ratio of the slopes was between 0.5 and 2.
RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the two populations studied, Japanese vs. Caucasians, respectively, for moxifloxacin Cmax (3.27 ± 0.6 vs. 2.98 ± 0.7 µg ml(-1) ), ΔΔQTc F (9.63 ± 1.15 vs. 11.46 ± 1.19 ms at Cmax of 3.07 µg ml(-1) ) and concentration-response slopes (2.58 ± 0.62 vs. 2.34 ± 0.64 ms per µg ml(-1) ). The difference in the two ΔΔQTc F of -1.8 (90% CI -4.6, 0.9) and the ratio of the two slopes (1.1; 90% CI 0.63, 1.82) were within pre-specified equivalence limits.
CONCLUSIONS: Moxifloxacin-induced QTc prolongations did not differ significantly between the Japanese and Caucasian subjects. However, before our findings are more widely generalized, further studies in other populations and with other QT-prolonging drugs are needed to clarify whether inter-ethnic differences in QT sensitivity exist and whether ethnicity of the study population may affect the outcome of a TQT study.
METHODS: A two period, randomized, crossover, ICH-E14-compliant thorough QT (TQT) study compared placebo-corrected changes in QTc interval from baseline (ΔΔQTc F) and concentration-effect relationships following administration of placebo and 400 mg moxifloxacin to 40 healthy male volunteers from each ethnic population. The point estimates of ΔΔQTc F for each population, and the difference between the two, were calculated at a geometric mean Cmax of moxifloxacin using a linear mixed effects model. The concentration-effect slopes of the two populations were also compared. Equivalence was concluded if the two-sided 90% confidence interval of the difference in ΔΔQTc F was contained within -5 ms to +5 ms limits and the ratio of the slopes was between 0.5 and 2.
RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences between the two populations studied, Japanese vs. Caucasians, respectively, for moxifloxacin Cmax (3.27 ± 0.6 vs. 2.98 ± 0.7 µg ml(-1) ), ΔΔQTc F (9.63 ± 1.15 vs. 11.46 ± 1.19 ms at Cmax of 3.07 µg ml(-1) ) and concentration-response slopes (2.58 ± 0.62 vs. 2.34 ± 0.64 ms per µg ml(-1) ). The difference in the two ΔΔQTc F of -1.8 (90% CI -4.6, 0.9) and the ratio of the two slopes (1.1; 90% CI 0.63, 1.82) were within pre-specified equivalence limits.
CONCLUSIONS: Moxifloxacin-induced QTc prolongations did not differ significantly between the Japanese and Caucasian subjects. However, before our findings are more widely generalized, further studies in other populations and with other QT-prolonging drugs are needed to clarify whether inter-ethnic differences in QT sensitivity exist and whether ethnicity of the study population may affect the outcome of a TQT study.