Circulation. Cardiovascular imaging · 2016
Coronary Calcification and Plaque Vulnerability: An Optical Coherence Tomographic Study.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Ong Daniel S, Lee Jay S, Soeda Tsunenari, Higuma Takumi, Minami Yoshiyasu, Wang Zhao, Lee Hang, Yokoyama Hiroaki, Yokota Takashi, Okumura Ken, Jang Ik-Kyung
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Spotty superficial calcium deposits have been implicated in plaque vulnerability based on previous intravascular imaging studies. Biomechanical models suggest that microcalcifications between 5 and 65 µm in diameter can intensify fibrous cap stress, promoting plaque rupture. However, the 100- to 200-µm resolution of intravascular ultrasound limits its ability to discriminate single calcium deposits from clusters of smaller deposits, and a previous optical coherence tomographic investigation evaluated calcifications within a long segment of artery, which may not truly reflect the mechanics involved in potentiating focal plaque rupture.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Detailed optical coherence tomographic assessment of coronary calcification at the culprit plaque (10-mm length) was performed in 53 patients with acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction mediated by plaque rupture and 55 patients with stable angina pectoris. The number and longitudinal length of individual calcium deposits were recorded. Cross-sectional images were analyzed every 1 mm for calcium arc and depth, and these quantitative parameters were used to define individual deposits as spotty, large, and superficial. There was no significant difference between ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction mediated by plaque rupture and stable angina pectoris groups in the number of total (P=0.58), spotty (P=0.87), or large calcium deposits (P=0.27). Minimum calcium depth was similar between groups (P=0.27), as was the number of superficial deposits (P=0.35 using a 65-µm depth threshold and P=0.84 using a 100-µm depth threshold).
CONCLUSIONS: The number and pattern of culprit plaque calcifications did not differ between patients presenting with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction mediated by plaque rupture versus stable angina pectoris. The optical coherence tomographic assessment of coronary calcification may not be a useful marker of local plaque vulnerability as previously suspected.
REGISTRATION INFORMATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01110538.
METHODS AND RESULTS: Detailed optical coherence tomographic assessment of coronary calcification at the culprit plaque (10-mm length) was performed in 53 patients with acute ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction mediated by plaque rupture and 55 patients with stable angina pectoris. The number and longitudinal length of individual calcium deposits were recorded. Cross-sectional images were analyzed every 1 mm for calcium arc and depth, and these quantitative parameters were used to define individual deposits as spotty, large, and superficial. There was no significant difference between ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction mediated by plaque rupture and stable angina pectoris groups in the number of total (P=0.58), spotty (P=0.87), or large calcium deposits (P=0.27). Minimum calcium depth was similar between groups (P=0.27), as was the number of superficial deposits (P=0.35 using a 65-µm depth threshold and P=0.84 using a 100-µm depth threshold).
CONCLUSIONS: The number and pattern of culprit plaque calcifications did not differ between patients presenting with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction mediated by plaque rupture versus stable angina pectoris. The optical coherence tomographic assessment of coronary calcification may not be a useful marker of local plaque vulnerability as previously suspected.
REGISTRATION INFORMATION: URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01110538.