MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/17562872261467267

Медицинская библиотека · Therapeutic advances in urology · 2026

Thulium fiber laser versus high-power holmium laser for renal stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis of high-quality studies.

Fong Khi Yung, Lee Han Jie, Yeap Pierre, Du Jingzeng, Low Alvin Wei Xiang, Chong Tsung Wen, Sundaram Palaniappan

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Thulium fiber laser (TFL) and high-power Holmium:Yttrium-Aluminum-Garnet laser (HPHL) are common laser modalities used in flexible ureteroscopy (F-URS). Existing comparisons are imperfect due to lack of randomization, use of obsolete low-power settings, and the recent advent of technologies such as flexible and navigable ureteral access sheaths (FANS).

OBJECTIVES

To compare the safety and efficacy of TFL versus HPHL for F-URS in renal stones.

DESIGN

A PRISMA-compliant literature review was conducted on PubMed, EMBASE, Scopus and for randomized trials or propensity score-matched studies comparing TFL to HPHL in renal stones.

DATA SOURCES AND

METHODS

Primary outcomes were study-defined stone-free rate (SFR), as well as 100% SFR (zero residual fragments). Secondary outcomes were total operation time, all complications, bleeding complications, postoperative fever, and reintervention. Random-effects meta-analyses were performed to generate risk ratios (RRs) or mean differences (MDs).

RESULTS

Eight studies (1290 patients) were shortlisted for analysis. Only one utilized FANS; three did not routinely use ureteral access sheaths. Between TFL and HPHL, there was no significant difference in study-reported SFR (RR = 1.17, 95% CI = 0.98-1.40, p = 0.07), 100% SFR (RR = 1.16, 95% CI = 0.90-1.50, p = 0.19), total operation time (MD -1.0 min, 95% CI = -8.8 to 6.8 min, p = 0.75), all complications (RR = 1.01, 95% CI = 0.54-1.87, p = 0.97), bleeding complications (RR = 0.59, 95%CI = 0.01-23.3, p = 0.60), postoperative fever (RR = 1.23, 95% CI = 0.68-2.24, p = 0.27), and reintervention (RR = 0.72, 95% CI = 0.38-1.34, p = 0.15).

CONCLUSION

This meta-analysis of high-quality studies found no significant differences between HPHL and TFL in the trifecta of outcomes-SFR, complications, and reintervention-in F-URS for renal stones. Continued re-evaluation of this field remains a necessity as technological advancements such as FANS and novel lasers continue to emerge.

Для цитирования: Fong Khi Yung, Lee Han Jie, Yeap Pierre, Du Jingzeng, Low Alvin Wei Xiang, Chong Tsung Wen, Sundaram Palaniappan. Thulium fiber laser versus high-power holmium laser for renal stones: a systematic review and meta-analysis of high-quality studies.. Therapeutic advances in urology. 2026. DOI: 10.1177/17562872261467267.
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.