MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/ases.13149

Медицинская библиотека · Asian journal of endoscopic surgery · 2022

Ureteral identification with indocyanine green in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

Rodríguez-Zentner Homero, Cukier Moises, Montagne Vianette, Arrue Emmy

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Fluorescence-guided surgery has emerged as a complement of traditional laparoscopic surgery with the advantage that is adaptable to existent platforms. The purpose of this article is to describe our technique for ureteral identification with indocyanine green (ICG) during laparoscopic colorectal surgery.

MATERIALS AND SURGICAL TECHNIQUE: We report a case series of all patients who underwent laparoscopic colorectal surgery and ureteral injection of ICG in a private third level hospital.

RESULTS

We performed 30 laparoscopic colorectal surgeries in which we used this technique to identify the ureters. Mean age was 52.6 ± 15.28 years; 16 (53.3%) were men. The indication for surgery was diverticulitis in 18 patients. Mean urological operative time was 22.4 minutes. There were no immediate or delayed adverse effects attributable to intra-ureteral ICG administration.

DISCUSSION: Although ureteric iatrogenic injury is uncommon, when it does happen, it significantly increases the patient's morbidity. We consider this technique has the potential to make laparoscopic surgeries safer mostly in patients with cancer, diverticular disease or endometriosis who have extensive fibrosis, adhesions, and inflammation.

Для цитирования: Rodríguez-Zentner Homero, Cukier Moises, Montagne Vianette, Arrue Emmy. Ureteral identification with indocyanine green in laparoscopic colorectal surgery.. Asian journal of endoscopic surgery. 2022. DOI: 10.1111/ases.13149.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.