Surgical endoscopy · 2013
Urgent laparoscopic repair of acutely symptomatic PEH is safe and effective.
Контролируемое клиническое исследованиеСтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Parker David M, Rambhajan Amrit, Johanson Katherine, Ibele Anna, Gabrielsen Jon D, Petrick Anthony T
Аннотация
BACKGROUND: Acute incarceration of paraesophageal hernias (PEHs) requiring urgent or emergent surgery is rare. Patients are often elderly with significant comorbidities and have historically been treated with open abdominal or thoracic incisions. Our study was designed to evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair (LPEHR) in patients with PEH and acute gastric volvulus.
METHODS: We reviewed our prospectively maintained database and identified 269 patients who underwent an initial LPEHR between January 2003 and January 2012. Patients were divided into group A (acute), group B (age- and comorbidity-matched 1:3), and group C (all elective repairs). Group A included those admitted with acute symptoms related to PEH and underwent urgent repair. Patient age, Charlson score, operative time, length of stay (LOS), morbidity, mortality, and recurrence rates were compared.
RESULTS: Patients who underwent urgent LPEHR had a higher perioperative morbidity rate than the elective and matched groups. The overall mortality rate was low and no statistical difference was found between groups A, B, and C. LOS in group A was longer than groups B and C. The need for ICU admission was also higher in group A. There was no statistical difference in recurrence rates.
CONCLUSIONS: Historically, patients presenting with acute symptoms related to PEH have required open repair, which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The acute group was older and sicker than our elective LPEHR patients and had more adverse events resulting in a longer LOS, even when compared with comorbidity-matched elective patients. However, the LOS remained shorter than that reported for open repair and there was no mortality. The recurrence rates in all groups were low and comparable to elective repairs.
METHODS: We reviewed our prospectively maintained database and identified 269 patients who underwent an initial LPEHR between January 2003 and January 2012. Patients were divided into group A (acute), group B (age- and comorbidity-matched 1:3), and group C (all elective repairs). Group A included those admitted with acute symptoms related to PEH and underwent urgent repair. Patient age, Charlson score, operative time, length of stay (LOS), morbidity, mortality, and recurrence rates were compared.
RESULTS: Patients who underwent urgent LPEHR had a higher perioperative morbidity rate than the elective and matched groups. The overall mortality rate was low and no statistical difference was found between groups A, B, and C. LOS in group A was longer than groups B and C. The need for ICU admission was also higher in group A. There was no statistical difference in recurrence rates.
CONCLUSIONS: Historically, patients presenting with acute symptoms related to PEH have required open repair, which is associated with significant morbidity and mortality. The acute group was older and sicker than our elective LPEHR patients and had more adverse events resulting in a longer LOS, even when compared with comorbidity-matched elective patients. However, the LOS remained shorter than that reported for open repair and there was no mortality. The recurrence rates in all groups were low and comparable to elective repairs.