MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1177/0218492309104773

Медицинская библиотека · Asian cardiovascular & thoracic annals · 2009

Leaflet suspension and subvalvular annuloplasty in aortic valve prolapse.

Izumoto Hiroshi, Kawazoe Kohei, Oka Takanori, Ishibashi Kazuyuki, Yamamoto Hiroshi, Yamamoto Fumio

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

We have utilized the combined techniques of subvalvular annuloplasty and leaflet suspension since 1999 to repair prolapsing aortic valves. We reviewed our short-term results to assess perioperative echocardiographic changes and repair durability. Nineteen patients (15 men and 4 women; mean age, 60.7 years) underwent this operation between July 1999 and June 2002. All were interviewed to establish their latest functional status, reoperation and survival rates. After a mean follow-up of 40.1 months, all patients were alive and in New York Heart Association functional class I. The echocardiographic grade of aortic regurgitation decreased from 3.2 preoperatively to 1.6 at follow-up. Left ventricular end-diastolic dimension shortened significantly from 6.2 to 5.2 cm. Left ventricular end-systolic dimension decreased from 4.1 to 3.3 cm. Annulus size was also significantly less at 2.2 cm from 2.5 cm preoperatively. At 48 months, freedom from reoperation was 88.9% +/- 7.4%. The follow-up was 100% complete. Repair of a prolapsing aortic valve with leaflet suspension and subvalvular annuloplasty is a good procedure and the short-term results are satisfying.

Для цитирования: Izumoto Hiroshi, Kawazoe Kohei, Oka Takanori, Ishibashi Kazuyuki, Yamamoto Hiroshi, Yamamoto Fumio. Leaflet suspension and subvalvular annuloplasty in aortic valve prolapse.. Asian cardiovascular & thoracic annals. 2009. DOI: 10.1177/0218492309104773.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.