DOI 10.1016/j.jacep.2021.04.015
Stellate Ganglion Phototherapy Using Low-Level Laser: A Novel Rescue Therapy for Patients With Refractory Ventricular Arrhythmias.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVES
This study investigates the effect of stellate ganglion (SG) phototherapy in healthy participants and assesses its efficacy in suppressing electrical storm (ES) refractory to antiarrhythmic drugs and catheter ablation.
BACKGROUND
Modulation of the autonomic nervous system has been shown to be an effective adjunctive therapy for ES.
METHODS
Ten-minute SG phototherapy was performed twice weekly for 4 weeks in 20 healthy volunteers. To evaluate the acute and chronic effects of SG phototherapy, heart rate variability and serum concentrations of adrenaline, noradrenaline, and dopamine were obtained before phototherapy, immediately after the first phototherapy session, after 8 sessions of phototherapy, and 3 months after the first phototherapy session. In addition, the efficacy of SG phototherapy was evaluated in 11 patients with ES refractory to medication, sedation, and catheter ablation.
RESULTS
In healthy participants, serum adrenaline concentration significantly decreased after phototherapy, whereas low-frequency power/high-frequency power significantly decreased during phototherapy. Moreover, the effect on heart rate variability did not last beyond 3 months. In the clinical pilot study, 7 patients had a suppression of ES after SG phototherapy; however, without maintenance therapy, 2 patients had a recurrence of ventricular arrhythmias. Furthermore, it did not control ES in 4 patients.
CONCLUSIONS
SG phototherapy reduced sympathetic activity and may be a safe and effective adjunctive therapy to control ES in some patients, but its long-term efficacy remains unknown. Chronic phototherapy might help reduce ES recurrence.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.