Anticancer research · 2024
Clinical Value of Fine Needle Aspiration Cytology and Core Needle Biopsy in Head and Neck Pathology - A Nationwide Survey in Germany.
СтатьяНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Geisthoff Urban W, Droege Freya, Hand Catherine, Holtmann Laura C, Mattheis Stefan, Hoch Stephan, Lang Stephan, Stuck Boris A, Guntinas-Lichius Orlando, Rudhart Stefan A
Аннотация
BACKGROUND/AIM: Fine-needle aspiration cytology (FNA) and core needle biopsy (CNB) of the thyroid gland, salivary glands, and lymph nodes are considered simple and rapid methods for minimally invasive tissue collection. We performed a postal survey to analyse the diagnostic value and complication rate of FNA and CNB in Germany.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A questionnaire comprising 11 questions was sent to all 161 German ENT departments in September 2015.
RESULTS: The response rate was 45%. In 33 of the 73 responding clinics neither FNA nor CNB were carried out. Of the 26 clinics that provided detailed reasons, the majority (n=18) cited a lack of expertise among the collaborating pathologists. Overall, FNA was used more often, regardless of the anatomical region investigated. The study was based on a total of 36,684 FNAs and 9,624 CNBs. The rate of estimated meaningful and correct findings was 63% (10%-90%) for FNA, and 83% (50%-100%) for CNB. In eight cases (<0.001%) a potential tumor cell spread was reported.
CONCLUSION: This is the first nationwide survey in Germany to investigate the utility of FNA and CNB across different localizations in the head and neck region. This study revealed comparable results to the literature regarding the diagnostic value of FNA and CNB. Cell spreading was only observed in individual cases. The appraisal of needle biopsies in the head and neck area seems to be rather inhomogeneous in Germany.
PATIENTS AND METHODS: A questionnaire comprising 11 questions was sent to all 161 German ENT departments in September 2015.
RESULTS: The response rate was 45%. In 33 of the 73 responding clinics neither FNA nor CNB were carried out. Of the 26 clinics that provided detailed reasons, the majority (n=18) cited a lack of expertise among the collaborating pathologists. Overall, FNA was used more often, regardless of the anatomical region investigated. The study was based on a total of 36,684 FNAs and 9,624 CNBs. The rate of estimated meaningful and correct findings was 63% (10%-90%) for FNA, and 83% (50%-100%) for CNB. In eight cases (<0.001%) a potential tumor cell spread was reported.
CONCLUSION: This is the first nationwide survey in Germany to investigate the utility of FNA and CNB across different localizations in the head and neck region. This study revealed comparable results to the literature regarding the diagnostic value of FNA and CNB. Cell spreading was only observed in individual cases. The appraisal of needle biopsies in the head and neck area seems to be rather inhomogeneous in Germany.