Lymphedema Surveillance and Patient-Reported Anxiety: Comparison Between Volumetric Assessment and Bioimpedance Analysis.

Background

Lymphedema is a complication of breast cancer therapy associated with substantial anxiety. We designed a prospective, randomized study to assess the psychosocial impact of different surveillance methods for lymphedema. Methods and

Results

In this open-label study of 38 women undergoing breast cancer surgery, we screened for lymphedema using traditional volumetric measurements (circumferential readings from the wrist to the axilla) versus bioimpedance spectroscopy (BIS) using electric current. The primary outcome measure was total anxiety measured by the Beck Anxiety Inventory, a 21-item questionnaire administered at preoperative, 6-week, 3-month, and 6-month postoperative visits (range 0-63 points). Outcome metrics were compared after adjustment for baseline anxiety. There were no differences in clinical characteristics or cancer therapies between groups, except for more reoperation for positive surgical margins in the BIS patients (5% vs. 32%, p = 0.036). Baseline anxiety, depression, and associated medical therapies were similar as well. Only one woman in each group developed lymphedema during the study. Anxiety was higher in the BIS group at baseline (mean Beck score 12.2 vs. 7.2, p < 0.001), but anxiety levels gradually declined by the end of the 6-month study in both groups, with no differences in adjusted anxiety scores between the two groups at any time point during follow-up (all p = NS).

Conclusions

In this pilot study of women scheduled for breast cancer surgery, most subjects reported mild anxiety at baseline, and anxiety levels fell during continued lymphedema surveillance visits. There was no difference in patient-reported anxiety when surveillance was performed using standard volumetric versus BIS measurements.