MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.3897/folmed.65.e76709

Медицинская библиотека · Folia medica · 2023

Can we predict death using scoring systems in patients with local peritonitis ? A retrospective study.

Dimitrov Evgeni N, Minkov Georgi A, Enchev Emil T, Halacheva Krasimira S, Yovtchev Yovcho P

СтатьяПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

INTRODUCTION

Prognostic scores in patients with local peritonitis (LP) have not yet been studied exhaustively.

AIM: We, therefore, aimed in this study to evaluate the ability of several scoring systems to predict death in LP.

MATERIALS AND

METHODS

A retrospective analysis including 68 patients with LP was conducted at Prof. Dr. Stoyan Kirkovich University Hospital in Stara Zagora from January 2017 to August 2021. Clinical and laboratory data needed for calculating the scoring systems were collected at admission or postoperatively. We compared the prognostic performance of WSES SSS, MPI, SIRS, and qSOFA using area under the receiver operation characteristics (AUROC) curves and bivariate correlation analysis.

RESULTS

The observed mortality rate was 8.8%. Among all scores, MPI showed the best prognostic performance (AUROC=0.805, 95% CI 0.660-0.950). A threshold MPI >25 points permitted prediction of adverse outcome with a sensitivity of 66.7% and a specificity of 80.6%. The only significant correlation was found between outcome and MPI (p=0.012, r=0.302).

Conclusions

The MPI has the ability to prognosticate mortality in patients with LP unlike WSES SSS, qSOFA and SIRS.

Для цитирования: Dimitrov Evgeni N, Minkov Georgi A, Enchev Emil T, Halacheva Krasimira S, Yovtchev Yovcho P. Can we predict death using scoring systems in patients with local peritonitis ? A retrospective study.. Folia medica. 2023. DOI: 10.3897/folmed.65.e76709.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.