DOI 10.1016/j.psychres.2025.116487
Screening for depressive disorders: Validation of the Patient Health Questionnaire for Adolescents (PHQ-A) in a population-based multi-ethnic Asian sample.
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE
To validate the Patient Health Questionnaire for Adolescents (PHQ-A) as a screening tool for depressive disorders in multi-ethnic Asian adolescents.
METHODS
323 English-speaking Singaporean adolescents completed the PHQ-A, Kiddie Schedule for Affective Disorders and Schizophrenia Present and Lifetime Version (K-SADS-PL), and measures of depressive symptoms (Hamilton Depression Rating Scale), suicidality (Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale), adverse childhood experiences (ACES), and quality of life (Youth Quality of Life Instrument - Short Form) as part of a larger nationwide cross-sectional school-based epidemiological study. Internal consistency, construct validity, and diagnostic accuracy of the PHQ-A were evaluated. The area under the ROC curve (AUC) values for Major Depressive Disorder (MDD), Persistent Depressive Disorder (PDD), and Adjustment Disorder (AD) were examined separately.
RESULTS
The PHQ-A demonstrated high internal consistency (Cronbach's α = 0.89) and was positively associated with adverse childhood experiences (ρ = 0.11, p = 0.042), suicidality (ρ = 0.43, p < 0.001), and depressive symptoms (ρ = 0.63, p < 0.001), and negatively associated with quality of life (ρ = -0.59, p < 0.001). The performance of the PHQ-A was acceptable for MDD (AUC = 0.79, 95 % CI = 0.72 - 0.85) but poorer for PDD (AUC = 0.68, 95 % CI = 0.58 - 0.77) and AD (AUC = 0.53, 95 % CI = 0.41 - 0.65).
CONCLUSION
The PHQ-A shows acceptable psychometric properties for screening for diagnosis of MDD, but not for PDD or AD, among English-speaking Asian adolescents. A cut-off score of ≥ 10 for MDD is recommended.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.