Neurology · 2011
Quantitative telemedicine ratings in Batten disease: implications for rare disease research.
СтатьяПоддержка NIH: внешняя программаПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Cialone J, Augustine E F, Newhouse N, Vierhile A, Marshall F J, Mink J W
Аннотация
OBJECTIVE: To determine if remote administration of the Unified Batten Disease Rating Scale (UBDRS) Physical Impairment subscale by telemedicine is reliable and feasible across a broad range of disease severity.
METHODS: For the majority (n = 10) of subjects, the examination was performed by a nonphysician who had been trained to perform the examination but not to score the subjects. A trained rater scored the subjects via live video; a second trained rater performed a separate examination in person and scored that examination. For 3 telemedicine evaluations, examinations were performed and scored by a trained rater while a second trained rater simultaneously scored the subjects via live video. Reliability was determined by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
RESULTS: Subjects (n = 13) represented a wide range of disease severity. Remote administration of the UBDRS Physical Impairment subscale had high interrater reliability across all subjects (ICC = 0.94). When only the subjects (n = 10) who had been examined by the nonphysician and scored remotely were included in the analysis, the reliability was unchanged (ICC = 0.95).
CONCLUSIONS: The UBDRS Physical Impairment subscale is reliable and feasible for remote administration. Telemedicine has the potential to be a useful tool in rare neurologic disease research and clinical assessment.
METHODS: For the majority (n = 10) of subjects, the examination was performed by a nonphysician who had been trained to perform the examination but not to score the subjects. A trained rater scored the subjects via live video; a second trained rater performed a separate examination in person and scored that examination. For 3 telemedicine evaluations, examinations were performed and scored by a trained rater while a second trained rater simultaneously scored the subjects via live video. Reliability was determined by intraclass correlation coefficient (ICC).
RESULTS: Subjects (n = 13) represented a wide range of disease severity. Remote administration of the UBDRS Physical Impairment subscale had high interrater reliability across all subjects (ICC = 0.94). When only the subjects (n = 10) who had been examined by the nonphysician and scored remotely were included in the analysis, the reliability was unchanged (ICC = 0.95).
CONCLUSIONS: The UBDRS Physical Impairment subscale is reliable and feasible for remote administration. Telemedicine has the potential to be a useful tool in rare neurologic disease research and clinical assessment.