MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1111/bjh.15824

Медицинская библиотека · British journal of haematology · 2019

A phase III randomized, multicentre, double blind, active controlled trial to compare the efficacy and safety of two different anagrelide formulations in patients with essential thrombocythaemia - the TEAM-ET 2·0 trial.

Gisslinger Heinz, Buxhofer-Ausch Veronika, Hodisch Juri, Radinoff Atanas, Karyagina Elena, Kyrcz-Krzemień Slawomira, Abdulkadyrov Kudrat, Gerbutavicius Rolandas, Melikyan Anait, Burgstaller Sonja, Hus Marek, Kłoczko Janusz, Yablokova Vera, Tzvetkov Nikolay, Całbecka Malgorzata, Shneyder Tatyana, Warzocha Krzysztof, Jurgutis Mindaugas, Kaplanov Kamil, Jilma Bernd, Schoergenhofer Christian, Klade Christoph

Клиническое исследование III фазыСравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеРандомизированное исследованиеПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАEquivalence TrialПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Anagrelide is an established treatment option for essential thrombocythaemia (ET). A prolonged release formulation was developed with the aim of reducing dosing frequency and improving tolerability, without diminishing efficacy. This multicentre, randomized, double blind, active-controlled, non-inferiority trial investigated the efficacy, safety and tolerability of anagrelide prolonged release (A-PR) over a reference product in high-risk ET patients, either anagrelide-naïve or -experienced. In a 6 to 12-week titration period the individual dose for the consecutive 4-week maintenance period was identified. The primary endpoint was the mean platelet count during the maintenance period (3 consecutive measurements, day 0, 14, 28). Of 112 included patients 106 were randomized. The mean screening platelet counts were 822 × 109 /l (95% confidence interval (CI) 707-936 × 109 /l) and 797 × 109 /l (95% CI 708-883 × 109 /l) for A-PR and the reference product, respectively. Both treatments effectively reduced platelet counts, to mean 281 × 109 /l for A-PR (95% CI 254-311) and 305 × 109 /l (95% CI 276-337) for the reference product (P < 0·0001, for non-inferiority). Safety and tolerability were comparable between both drugs. The novel prolonged-release formulation was equally effective and well tolerated compared to the reference product. A-PR provides a more convenient dosing schedule and will offer an alternative to licensed immediate-release anagrelide formulations.

Для цитирования: Gisslinger Heinz, Buxhofer-Ausch Veronika, Hodisch Juri, Radinoff Atanas, Karyagina Elena, Kyrcz-Krzemień Slawomira, Abdulkadyrov Kudrat, Gerbutavicius Rolandas, Melikyan Anait, Burgstaller Sonja, Hus Marek, Kłoczko Janusz, Yablokova Vera, Tzvetkov Nikolay, Całbecka Malgorzata, Shneyder Tatyana, Warzocha Krzysztof, Jurgutis Mindaugas, Kaplanov Kamil, Jilma Bernd, Schoergenhofer Christian, Klade Christoph. A phase III randomized, multicentre, double blind, active controlled trial to compare the efficacy and safety of two different anagrelide formulations in patients with essential thrombocythaemia - the TEAM-ET 2·0 trial.. British journal of haematology. 2019. DOI: 10.1111/bjh.15824.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.