MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.03.262

Медицинская библиотека · The American journal of cardiology · 2017

Radial Versus Femoral Access for the Treatment of Left Main Lesion in the Era of Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents.

Gili Sebastiano, D'Ascenzo Fabrizio, Di Summa Roberto, Conrotto Federico, Cerrato Enrico, Chieffo Alaide, Boccuzzi Giacomo, Montefusco Antonio, Ugo Fabrizio, Omedé Pierluigi, Kawamoto Hiroyoshi, Tomassini Francesco, Pavani Marco, Varbella Ferdinando, Garbo Roberto, D'Amico Maurizio, Biondi Zoccai Giuseppe, Moretti Claudio, Escaned Javier, Colombo Antonio, Gaita Fiorenzo

Сравнительное исследованиеСтатьяМногоцентровое исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

Transradial access (TRA) is often avoided in favor of the transfemoral access (TFA) during percutaneous coronary interventions of the unprotected left main coronary artery (ULM), due to technical and safety concerns. The aim of this study was to compare the performance of TRA and TFA in the treatment of ULM with second-generation drug-eluting stents. Consecutive patients who underwent percutaneous coronary intervention on ULM with second-generation drug-eluting stents were retrospectively enrolled in the multicenter Failure in Left Main Study With 2nd Generation Stents (FAILS 2) registry. Patients were stratified according to the arterial access. The choice between TRA and TFA was left to each operator's preferences. Bleedings during index hospitalization were the primary end point. Secondary end points were major adverse cardiovascular events (a composite of death, reinfarction, and target lesion revascularization), the single components of major adverse cardiovascular events at follow-up and stent thrombosis. Propensity score matching was executed to account for possible confounding. Overall, 1,247 patients were enrolled (23.2% [289] of female gender, mean age 70.2 ± 10.2 years). Diagnosis at presentation was stable angina in 603 (48.7%) cases, non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndrome in 465 (37.3%), ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction in 117 (9.5%). Mean follow-up was 726 ± 654 days. After propensity score with matching, 354 patients were included. The primary end point was significantly reduced in patients treated with TRA (2.0% vs 4.0%, p = 0.042), whereas no differences emerged pertaining the secondary end points, including target lesion revascularization and reinfarction. In conclusion, TRA may reduce in-hospital bleedings in patients undergoing percutaneous treatment of the ULM, without increasing the rate of adverse cardiovascular events at follow-up, and may therefore be safely used in the treatment of the ULM.

Для цитирования: Gili Sebastiano, D'Ascenzo Fabrizio, Di Summa Roberto, Conrotto Federico, Cerrato Enrico, Chieffo Alaide, Boccuzzi Giacomo, Montefusco Antonio, Ugo Fabrizio, Omedé Pierluigi, Kawamoto Hiroyoshi, Tomassini Francesco, Pavani Marco, Varbella Ferdinando, Garbo Roberto, D'Amico Maurizio, Biondi Zoccai Giuseppe, Moretti Claudio, Escaned Javier, Colombo Antonio, Gaita Fiorenzo. Radial Versus Femoral Access for the Treatment of Left Main Lesion in the Era of Second-Generation Drug-Eluting Stents.. The American journal of cardiology. 2017. DOI: 10.1016/j.amjcard.2017.03.262.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.