MedElevator Войти в исследования
← Поиск публикаций

DOI 10.1007/s00432-025-06242-6

Медицинская библиотека · Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology · 2025

Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China based on real-world studies.

Wan Ning, Yang Chen, Wang Bing, Guo Ya, He ZiJian, Lv YaJuan, Lu LiQing, Yang Ning, Xiao WeiBin, Chen YongBang, Yuan Jin, Yang DanDan, Liu Tao, Fang WenFeng, Chen ZhuoJia, Liang WeiTing

СтатьяСравнительное исследованиеПеревод пока не подготовлен

Аннотация

BACKGROUND

Although pembrolizumab has been shown to be effective, its high price has prevented it from being widely used. Especially in the real world, the application situation is still uncertain. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab on the basis of real-world studies, from the perspective of the health care system.

METHODS

Retrospectively, 630 patients with advanced NSCLC treated with pembrolizumab (monotherapy or combination chemotherapy) versus chemotherapy alone from January 2020 to December 2022 at a large 3 A hospital in China were included. Confounders between groups were eliminated using propensity score matching analysis. A partitioned survival model was developed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy for the treatment of advanced NSCLC based on progression-free survival, overall survival, and the incidence of adverse effects in the two matched groups (n = 450 patients). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio was calculated. The impact of a drug donation program on the cost-effectiveness of pembrolizumab was also evaluated.

RESULTS

Pembrolizumab significantly improved median PFS in patients (15.5 months vs. 8.8 months). The median OS in the Pembrolizumab group has not been reached, while it was 26.2 months in the chemotherapy group. When the drug donation program is not considered, the ICER of pembrolizumab is $146,409.07/QALY. Regardless of whether the willingness-to-pay threshold is set at three times the per capita GDP of China ($36,070.2) or three times the per capita GDP of Guangdong Province ($64,523.8), the use of pembrolizumab is not cost-effective. However, after considering the drug donation program, the ICER decreased to $56,127.74/QALY. Under the willingness-to-pay threshold of three times the per capita GDP of Guangzhou in 2022 ($64,523.8), pembrolizumab became a cost-effective choice.

CONCLUSION

In the treatment of advanced NSCLC in China, pembrolizumab, particularly when considering the drug donation program, offers better survival outcomes and becomes cost-effective. This highlights the importance of such programs in making high-cost treatments accessible in real-world clinical settings.

Для цитирования: Wan Ning, Yang Chen, Wang Bing, Guo Ya, He ZiJian, Lv YaJuan, Lu LiQing, Yang Ning, Xiao WeiBin, Chen YongBang, Yuan Jin, Yang DanDan, Liu Tao, Fang WenFeng, Chen ZhuoJia, Liang WeiTing. Cost-effectiveness analysis of pembrolizumab versus chemotherapy in advanced non-small cell lung cancer in China based on real-world studies.. Journal of cancer research and clinical oncology. 2025. DOI: 10.1007/s00432-025-06242-6.

Предметные рубрики MeSH

Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…

История · было → стало

Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.

Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.