Cost-Effectiveness of Pre-emptive DPYD Genotyping Compared to Standard of Care Among Patients Receiving Fluoropyrimidine-Based Anti-cancer Treatment in Australia.

BACKGROUND

Despite international evidence demonstrating pre-emptive pharmacogenetics (PGx) screening is cost effective or cost saving in preventing serious or fatal toxicities, it is not routinely adopted in Australia. This study evaluated the cost effectiveness of PGx screening versus standard of care (SOC) among patients with cancer undergoing fluoropyrimidine-based treatment (FP) in Australia.

METHODS

From the Australian healthcare perspective, we developed a cohort-based state transition model in TreeAge Pro 2024. The model used PACIFIC-PGx trial data for the PGx arm and literature-based inputs for the SOC arm. Patients transitioned between four health states (full-dose, reduced-dose, treatment termination or death) over two treatment cycles each corresponding to a standard 3-week period. Outcomes included the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) per quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) gained, per adverse event averted, and per hospitalisation avoided. Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses (DSA, PSA) evaluated the effects of varying assumptions and the uncertainty associated with input parameters.

RESULTS

PGx screening yielded incremental QALYs of 0.05 at an additional cost of $274.25 AUD (Australian dollars), resulting in an ICER of $6014.5 AUD per QALY gained compared to SOC. DSA showed the model's outcomes remained robust, with the ICER staying below the specified threshold of $50,000 AUD under a ± 20% variation in input parameters. PSA suggested PGx screening was favourable in 97.6% of iterations.

CONCLUSION

This Australian single-arm study demonstrated that pre-emptive PGx screening prevents severe, fatal FP-related toxicities and hospitalisations and is likely to be cost effective. Our findings suggest the value of PGx screening and warrant implementation and reimbursement within Australian healthcare settings.