DOI 10.1007/s00221-021-06225-2
Cognition effectiveness of continuous positive airway pressure treatment in obstructive sleep apnea syndrome patients with cognitive impairment: a meta-analysis.
Аннотация
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a common respiratory disorder characterized by recurrent pharyngeal collapses during sleep leading to intermittent hypoxia and sleep disruption. Cognitive challenges and high risks of cognitive impairment, including Alzheimer's disease (AD), are closely associated with OSA. Currently, continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) is widely used in the treatment of OSA. However, whether CPAP benefits cognitive functions in patients with OSA remains elusive. Here, we identified published studies through a systematic review of PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase, Wanfang Data, CBM, and CNKI from January 1, 1970, to July 1, 2020. 288 patients from 7 articles (one was excluded in the meta-analysis for it was a follow-up study) were included in the present study. It revealed that cognitive functions of OSA patients with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or AD were mildly but significantly improved after CPAP treatment (SMD 0.49, 95% CI 0.11-0.86), especially long-term CPAP treatment (SMD 0.56, 95% CI 0.10-1.02, p = 0.02), as measured by Mini-Mental State Examination (MMSE) (SMD 0.49, 95%CI 0.11-0.86). However, no significant cognition benefits were detected by the Montreal Cognitive Assessment (SMD 0.43, 95% CI 0.85-1.72). In terms of heterogeneity, cognitive improvements by CPAP were detectable on OSA patients either at a younger age or over longer periods of CPAP treatment. Therefore, our findings highlight the partial efficiency of CPAP treatment in cognition improvement of OSA patients with MCI or AD.
Предметные рубрики MeSH
Подготовка и перевод публикации
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Тип публикации указан по данным источника. Уровень доказательности автоматически не присваивается.