Plasmodium knowlesi infection is associated with elevated circulating biomarkers of brain injury and endothelial activation.

INTRODUCTION

Malaria remains a major public health concern with substantial morbidity and mortality worldwide. In Malaysia, the emergence of Plasmodium knowlesi has led to a surge in zoonotic malaria cases and deaths in recent years. Signs of cerebral involvement have been observed in a non-comatose, fatal case of severe knowlesi infection, but the potential impact of this malaria species on the brain remains underexplored. To address this gap, we investigated circulating levels of brain injury, inflammation, and vascular biomarkers in a cohort of knowlesi-infected patients and controls.

METHODS

Archived plasma samples from 19 patients with confirmed symptomatic knowlesi infection and 19 healthy, age-matched controls from Peninsular Malaysia were analysed. A total of 52 plasma biomarkers of brain injury, inflammation, and vascular activation were measured using Luminex and SIMOA assays. Wilcoxon tests were used to examine group differences, and biomarker profiles were explored through hierarchical clustering heatmap analysis.

RESULTS

Bonferroni-corrected analyses revealed significantly elevated brain injury biomarker levels in knowlesi-infected patients, including S100B (p<0.0001), Tau (p=0.0007), UCH-L1 (p<0.0001), αSyn (p<0.0001), Park7 (p=0.0006), NRGN (p=0.0022), and TDP-43 (p=0.005). Compared to controls, levels were lower in the infected group for BDNF (p<0.0001), CaBD (p<0.0001), CNTN1 (p<0.0001), NCAM-1 (p<0.0001), GFAP (p=0.0013), and KLK6 (p=0.0126). Hierarchical clustering revealed distinct group profiles for circulating levels of brain injury and vascular activation biomarkers.

CONCLUSIONS

Our findings highlight for the first time the impact of Plasmodium knowlesi infection on the brain, with distinct alterations in cerebral injury and endothelial activation biomarker profiles compared to healthy controls. Further studies are warranted to investigate the pathophysiology and clinical significance of these altered surrogate markers, through both neuroimaging and long-term neurocognitive assessments.