Respirology (Carlton, Vic.) · 2019
Epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM) from pleural fluid cell lysates is a highly accurate diagnostic biomarker of adenocarcinomatous effusions.
СтатьяПоддержка исследования: вне правительства СШАНазвание и аннотация: Перевод пока не подготовлен
Обработка статьи · этапы, ошибки и управление
Загрузка состояния…
Ошибки и ограничения
История · было → стало
Состояние обновляется каждые 5 секунд, пока блок открыт. Процент показывается только там, где известен объём работы. Пауза останавливает продолжение этапа; текущий запрос к источнику может завершиться.
Porcel José M, Esquerda Aureli, Bielsa Silvia, Novell Anna, Sorolla Maria Alba, Gatius Sonia, Zamora Carlos, Vidal Silvia, Salud Antonieta
Аннотация
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The discovery of highly accurate pleural fluid (PF) biomarkers of malignancy remains elusive. We assessed the operating characteristics of the PF epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM), claudin 4 (CL4) and human epididymis protein 4 (HE4) as potential markers of epithelial malignancies.
METHODS: The three markers were quantified by immunoassays in the supernatants (s) and cell lysates (cl) of 175 PF samples. The cut-off values with 100% specificity were selected for malignant-benign discrimination. An immunocytochemical staining index score for each marker was also evaluated on PF cell blocks. The resulting best biomarker was further validated in two independent populations of 73 and 48 patients with pleural effusions (PE).
RESULTS: An EpCAM(cl) >98 pg/g total lysate protein yielded 75% sensitivity, 100% specificity, negative likelihood ratio of 0.25 and area under the curve of 0.94 for labelling adenocarcinomatous effusions. Sensitivity reached 88% if EpCAM(cl) was combined with EpCAM immunostaining. One-third or more of the malignant effusions exhibiting a false-negative cytological fluid examination were correctly classified by EpCAM(cl) concentrations. Immunoassays for CL4 and HE4 were diagnostically useless.
CONCLUSION: EpCAM(cl) is a new biomarker of adenocarcinomatous PE with meaningful discriminating properties.
METHODS: The three markers were quantified by immunoassays in the supernatants (s) and cell lysates (cl) of 175 PF samples. The cut-off values with 100% specificity were selected for malignant-benign discrimination. An immunocytochemical staining index score for each marker was also evaluated on PF cell blocks. The resulting best biomarker was further validated in two independent populations of 73 and 48 patients with pleural effusions (PE).
RESULTS: An EpCAM(cl) >98 pg/g total lysate protein yielded 75% sensitivity, 100% specificity, negative likelihood ratio of 0.25 and area under the curve of 0.94 for labelling adenocarcinomatous effusions. Sensitivity reached 88% if EpCAM(cl) was combined with EpCAM immunostaining. One-third or more of the malignant effusions exhibiting a false-negative cytological fluid examination were correctly classified by EpCAM(cl) concentrations. Immunoassays for CL4 and HE4 were diagnostically useless.
CONCLUSION: EpCAM(cl) is a new biomarker of adenocarcinomatous PE with meaningful discriminating properties.